Linaria cannabina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Family: Passeriformes > Fringillidae
Widely distributed across Britain & Ireland all year round, this small finch is a species of open country and farmland.
UK Linnet numbers fell sharply between the late-1960s and the late-1980s. Since then, the decline has slowed, but the overall population trend is still on a downward trajectory. This negative trend is thought to be linked to increased nest failure associated with agricultural intensification. The Linnet has been on the UK Red List since 1996.
Linnets have an overall streaky brown appearance. Males have more distinctive plumage than females, with a grey head and pink patches on the forehead and chest. They also have a very melodious song. Linnets form big flocks during the winter months, sometimes mixing with other finches, combing the countryside in search of seeds to eat.
Select a topic for more facts and statistics about the Linnet
Linnet identification is often straightforward. The following article may help when identifying Linnet.
Linnets are familiar birds, but their scarcer cousins Twite are always a good find. Either on their usually remote breeding grounds in northern and western Britain, or around our coasts in winter, picking Twite out from Linnets can be a real ID headache. Let this workshop help you do that with confidence.
Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Linnet, provided by xeno-canto contributors.
Develop your bird ID skills with our training courses
Our interactive online courses are a great way to develop your bird identification skills, whether you're new to the hobby or a competent birder looking to hone your abilities.Browse training courses
Status and Trends
Population size and trends and patterns of distribution based on BTO surveys and atlases with data collected by BTO volunteers.
This species can be found on the following statutory and conservation listings and schedules.
Linnet abundance fell rapidly in the UK in the late 1960s, and again between the mid 1970s and mid 1980s, but decrease has been followed by a long period of relative stability. Numbers have fallen further since the start of BBS in 1994. The BBS map of change in relative density between 1994-96 and 2007-09 indicates that, in both Britain and Northern Ireland, there was decrease over that period in eastern regions and increase in the west. There has been a decline across Europe since 1980 (PECBMS: PECBMS 2020a>).
|UK breeding population
|-20% decrease (1995–2020)
Linnets require scattered bushes or scrub for nesting and seeds in the surrounding landscape for food. They are widely distributed through the breeding season, being found in virtually every 10-km square in England, Wales and Ireland. In Scotland, however, they are restricted to lower ground. During winter Linnets withdraw from upland areas and therefore have a slightly more restricted distribution than in the breeding season.
Occupied 10-km squares in UK
|No. occupied in breeding season
|% occupied in breeding season
|No. occupied in winter
|% occupied in winter
European Distribution Map
Breeding Season Habitats
|Most frequent in
|Also common in
Relative frequency by habitat
Breeding range extent has changed little, but abundance changes differ by region, with large increases in Ireland and in parts of northern and western Scotland, but declines on lower ground elsewhere in Britain.
Change in occupied 10-km squares in the UK
|% change in range in breeding season (1968–72 to 2008–11)
|% change in range in winter (1981–84 to 2007–11)
Linnet is recorded throughout the year, in flocks in winter and more dispersed and widely detected in the breeding season.
Information about movement and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.
An overview of year-round movements for the whole of Europe can be seen on the EuroBirdPortal viewer.
Lifecycle and body size information about Linnet, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.
View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report
|Maximum Age from Ringing
|8 years 3 months 25 days (set in 1975)
|2 years with breeding typically at 1 year
|0.34 (in first year)
|80.5±2.2 | Range 77–84mm, N=11433
|80.7±2.4 | Range 77-84mm, N=5943
|81.4±2 | Range 78–85mm, N=5937
|79.4±2 | Range 76–82mm, N=5389
|18.8±1.51 | Range 16.5–21.4g, N=9714
|19.2±1.745 | Range 16.5–22.1g, N=4839
|19.0±1.51 | Range 16.9–21.6g, N=5075
|18.5±1.46 | Range 16.3–21.0g, N=4553
Feather measurements and photos on featherbase
|2-letter: LI | 5-letter code: LINNE | Euring: 16600
For information in another language (where available) click on a linked name
Interpretation and scientific publications about Linnet from BTO scientists.
Causes of change
There is convincing evidence that nest failure rates rose during the principal period of population decline and this represents the most likely demographic mechanism driving the observed decreases in abundance. The most likely ecological driver of this pattern is habitat impoverishment due to agricultural intensification.
Further information on causes of change
Siriwardena et al. (1999, 2000b) provide convincing evidence that nest failure rates at the egg stage rose during the principal period of population decline and this represents the most likely demographic mechanism driving the observed decrease in abundance. They found an obvious change in the egg-stage failure rate of Linnet nests after 1975 and this was detectable in the total fledglings produced, suggesting that the deterioration in breeding performance had an important role in driving the species' concurrent decline in abundance (Siriwardena et al. 2000b). Moorcroft & Wilson (2000) concur that the severe decline during the 1970s and 1980s occurred via a reduction in breeding success, attributing this to a reduction in the availability of breeding-season food supplies on arable farmland caused by agricultural intensification. However, they state that the precise demographic mechanism involved is unclear: instead of breeding performance per attempt, they suggest reductions in the number of nesting attempts being made by individual females or a reduction in immediate post-fledging survival due to resource limitations as more likely, although these hypotheses were not tested. BTO monitoring data do not permit analysis of these parameters but it is plausible that such effects occurred in parallel with the breeding success effects indicated by NRS results. Nevertheless, all these patterns are consistent with the results of Siriwardena et al. (1999), who reported that index change was not significantly correlated with adult and first-year survival. They found no significant trend-specific difference in survival, and survival rates in periods of decline were higher than those in periods of increase.
After 1986, egg-stage nest survival increased and this led to a slight increase in breeding performance, although, as with the earlier decline, greater numbers of breeding attempts or increased post-fledging survival may also have contributed to the ending of population decline (Siriwardena et al. 2000b, Wilson et al. 1996, Moorcroft et al. 1997). Increases in the crop area of oilseed rape are thought to have improved Linnet breeding success by compensating for the herbicide-mediated decline in many farmland weeds that were traditionally important in this species' summer diet (Moorcroft et al. 1997). Both the number of breeding attempts possible in a season and post-fledging survival could have increased in response to this improvement in food supplies, as could chick survival. Oddly, Siriwardena et al. (2001b) identified a significant negative effect of rape on breeding performance through the egg-stage daily nest failure rate and no positive effect on success through the nestling stage in a further analysis of nest record data. This is clearly inconsistent with the results of intensive work on Linnets (Wilson et al. 1996, Moorcroft et al. 1997), perhaps reflecting the different geographical biases affecting nest records and this particular intensive study. Nevertheless, it suggests that environmental effects on Linnet breeding success show complex spatial variation and that the knock-on effects on trends in abundance could also be difficult to characterise. Modelling suggests that climate change may have had a positive impact on the long-term trend for this species, resulting in less negative trends than would have occurred in the absence of climate change (Pearce-Higgins & Crick 2019).
The current long-term pattern, spanning the Linnet's periods of decrease and relative stability, is of linear increase in nest failure rates and linear decline in the number of fledglings per breeding attempt.
Information about conservation actions
The decline of this species has been linked to decreased breeding success as a result of agricultural intensification. However, the exact mechanism behind the decline remains unclear and hence no specific conservation actions have been recommended relating to this species.
However, actions and policies aimed at helping other farmland species are also likely to benefit Linnets, in particular those aimed at improving breeding habitat and food availability during the breeding season (e.g. management of hedgerows, reducing pesticide and herbicide use and set-aside). One study suggested that increases in the crop area of oilseed rape may have improved Linnet breeding success (Moorcroft et al. 1997) but this was not supported by another study (Siriwrdena et al. 2001b, see Causes of Change section).
Although the decline in the 1970s and 1980s is believed to have been caused by problems during the breeding season, actions aimed at increasing food availability over winter could also benefit Linnet if they increase overwinter survival (e.g. overwinter stubbles, wild bird seed or cover mixtures, set-aside, buffer strips or uncultivated margins). One study in central England found that Linnets were found more frequently on barley stubbles than on wheat stubbles (Moorcroft et al. 2002), which is likely to be due to greater spillage losses of grain during harvesting of barley crops (e.g. Stacey et al. 2006).
Links to more information from ConservationEvidence.com
Would you like to search for another species?