Nine changes needed to deliver a radical transformation in biodiversity measurement

Nine changes needed to deliver a radical transformation in biodiversity measurement

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2026

Citation

Sutherland, W.J., Burgess, N.D., Edwards, S.V., Jones, J.P.G., Soltis, P.S., Tilman, D., Allen, J.M., Andrianandrasana, H.T., Armour, C.J., August, T., Bawa, K.S., Bailey, S., Birch, T., Boersch-Supan, P.H., Cavender-Bares, J., Blaxter, M., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daru, B.H., De Palma, A., Eisenberg, C., Elphick, C.S., Freckleton, R.P., Frick, W.F., Gonzalez, A., Goetz, S.J., Greenspoon, L., Grozinger, C.M., Hankins, D.L., Hazell, J., Isaac, N.J.B., Lambertini, M., Lewin, H.A., Mac Aodha, O., Madhavapeddy, A., Milner-Gulland, E.J., O’Dwyer, J.P., Purvis, A., Salafsky, N., Tallis, H., Tanshi, I., Vijay, V., Wikelski, M., Williams, D.R., Hollis Woodard, S. & Robinson, G.E. 2026. Nine changes needed to deliver a radical transformation in biodiversity measurement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123: doi:10.1073/pnas.2519345123
Acoustic monitoring device, by Simon Gillings

Overview

Biodiversity scientists are on the cusp of a transformative flood of new data, due to the combination of increasing demands for ecological information, more comprehensive and sophisticated analyses, and astonishing technological developments. This perspective paper identifies a set of recommendations to make the most of these opportunities while addressing the challenges.

In more detail

Delivering on these will require novel collaborations between communities who have not traditionally collaborated closely. Computer scientists, engineers, molecular biologists, data scientists, field ecologists, citizen scientists, Indigenous peoples, policy makers, and local communities need to work together to create rigorous, resilient, and accessible biodiversity information systems. The ultimate aim is to deliver real-time, localised but globally scalable assessments of biodiversity dynamics to inform decision-making by diverse stakeholders where and when it is needed.

Abstract

Biodiversity is declining in many parts of the world. Biological diversity measurement and monitoring are fundamental to the assessment of the causes and consequences of environmental changes, identification of key areas for the protection of biodiversity or ecosystem services, determining the effectiveness of actions, and the creation of decision-support tools critical to maintaining a sustainable planet. Biodiversity measurement is rapidly changing due to advances in citizen science, image recognition, acoustic monitoring, environmental DNA, genomics, remote sensing, and AI. In this perspective, we outline the exciting opportunities these developments offer but also consider the challenges. Our key recommendations are to 1) Capitalize on the ability of novel technology to integrate data sources 2) agree to standard methods for data collection 3) ensure new technologies are calibrated with existing data; 4) fill data gaps by using emerging technologies and increasing capacity, especially in the tropics; 5) create living safeguarded databases of trusted information to reduce the risk of poisoning by AI hallucinated, or false, information; 6) ensure data generation is valued; 7) ensure respectful incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge; 8) ensure measurements enable the quantification of effectiveness of actions, and 9) increase the resilience of global datasets to technical and societal change. Radical new collaborations are needed between computer scientists, engineers, molecular biologists, data scientists, field ecologists, citizen scientists, Indigenous peoples, policymakers, and local communities to create the rigorous, resilient, accessible biodiversity information systems required to underpin policies and practices that ensure the maintenance and restoration of ecological systems.

Staff author(s)

This work reflects ideas and discussions that emerged from the US–UK Forum on Measuring Biodiversity for Addressing the Global Biodiversity Crisis, jointly organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society.