Redshank

Redshank

Tringa totanus
Redshank, Allan Drewitt

Introduction

Distinctive with its red 'shanks' (or legs) this noisy wader is both a common breeder and a winter visitor.

In the breeding season Redshank mostly breed in lowland wet grassland sites, with pairs nesting close together to gain benefits from communal territorial defence. Once widespread across the country, BTO monitoring shows their distribution is becoming increasingly fragmented as numbers have fallen rapidly in response to changing agricultural practices.

In common with all waders, Redshank chicks are able to walk and feed almost as soon as they leave the nest. However, this makes them vulnerable to predators and they need areas of tall vegetation to hide in, close to damper patches where they can find invertebrate food.

  • Our Trends Explorer gives you the latest insight into how this species' population is changing.
Redshank, Allan Drewitt

Key Stats

Status
Common
Common
Weight
Weight
153.3g
BTO Records
BTO Records
960k records
Population and distribution stats for:
Population Change
Population Change
45% decrease 1995 to 2023
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
-43.1% contraction
Population Change
Population Change
21% decrease 1997 to 2022
Distribution Change
Distribution_change
2.9% expansion

Identification

Curated resources to aid in the identification of Redshank

ID Videos

This section features BTO training videos headlining this species, or featuring it as a potential confusion species.

Common shanks

Songs and Calls

Listen to example recordings of the main vocalisations of Redshank, provided by xeno-canto contributors.

Song:

Alarm call:

Flight call:

Movement

Information about Redshank movements and migration based on online bird portals (e.g. BirdTrack), Ringing schemes and tracking studies.

Britain & Ireland movement

View a summary of recoveries in the Online Ringing Report

Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

Dots show the foreign destinations of birds ringed in Britain & Ireland, and the origins of birds ringed overseas that were subsequently recaptured, resighted or found dead in Britain & Ireland. Dot colours indicate the time of year that the species was present at the location.

  • Winter (Nov-Feb)
  • Spring (Mar-Apr)
  • Summer (May-Jul)
  • Autumn (Aug-Oct)
Foreign locations of birds ringed or recovered in Britain & Ireland

European movements

EuroBirdPortal uses birdwatcher's records, such as those logged in BirdTrack to map the flows of birds as they arrive and depart Europe. See maps for this species here.

The Eurasian-African Migration Atlas shows movements of individual birds ringed or recovered in Europe. See maps for this species here.

Biology

Lifecycle and body size information for Redshank, including statistics on nesting, eggs and lifespan based on BTO ringing and nest recording data.

Productivity and Nesting

Nesting timing

Average (range) fo first clutch laying dates
1 May (14 Apr-7 Jun)
Typical (exceptional) number of broods
1

Egg measurements

Typical length x width
45x31 mm
Mass (% shell)
22.3g (5%)

Clutch Size

Typical number
4 eggs
Average ±1 standard deviation
3.87±0.43 eggs
Observed minimum and maximum
2-5 eggs

Incubation

Incubation by
Male + Female
Typical duration
24 days

Fledging

Type of chick
Precocial, downy
Typical duration
25-35 days
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Survival and Longevity

Survival is shown as the proportion of birds surviving from one year to the next and is derived from bird ringing data. It can also be used to estimate how long birds typically live.

View number ringed each year in the Online Ringing Report.

Lifespan

Typical life expectancy of bird reaching breeding age
4 years with breeding typically at 1 year
Maximum age from a ringed bird
20 years, 1 month, 15 days (set in 2007)

Survival of adults

All adults
0.74±0.014

Survival of juveniles

All juveniles
0.43±0.036 (in first year)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Biometrics

Wing length and body weights are from live birds (source).

Wing length

Average ±1 std deviation; range and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
167.5±5.4 mm
(158-175 mm, N=5879)
-
All adults
169.8±5.2 mm
(161-178 mm, N=10350)

Body weight

Average ±1 std deviation; 5th and 95th percentiles and sample size in brackets.
Juvenile
142.1±14.3 g
(120-166 g, N=5503)
-
All adults
153.3±17.6 g
(126-184 g, N=9959)
Visit our Trends Explorer for trend graphs and country statistics.

Ring Size

D2

Classification, names and codes

Taxonomy, names and species codes for Redshank

Classification and Codes

  • Order: Charadriiformes
  • Family: Scolopacidae
  • Scientific name: Tringa totanus
  • Authority: Linnaeus, 1758
  • BTO 2-letter code: RK
  • BTO 5-letter code: REDSH
  • Euring code number: 5460

Alternate species names

  • Catalan: gamba roja comuna
  • Czech: vodouš rudonohý
  • Danish: Rødben
  • Dutch: Tureluur
  • Estonian: punajalg-tilder
  • Finnish: punajalkaviklo
  • French: Chevalier gambette
  • Gaelic: Maor-cladaich
  • German: Rotschenkel
  • Hungarian: piroslábú cankó
  • Icelandic: Stelkur
  • Irish: Cosdeargán
  • Italian: Pettegola
  • Latvian: plavu tilbite
  • Lithuanian: raudonkojis tulikas
  • Norwegian: Rødstilk
  • Polish: krwawodziób
  • Portuguese: maçarico-de-perna-vermelha / perna-vermelha
  • Slovak: kalužiak cervenonohý
  • Slovenian: rdecenogi martinec
  • Spanish: Archibebe común
  • Swedish: rödbena
  • Welsh: Pibydd Coesgoch
  • English folkname(s): Watery Pleep, Ebb Cock, Pool Snipe

Research

Interpretation and scientific publications about Redshank from BTO scientists.

Causes of Change and Solutions

Causes of change

There is good evidence to suggest that Redshank decline is related to changes in habitat management, in particular drainage and agricultural intensification. Where birds still nest in wet meadows, a suggested solution includes manipulating water levels, reducing grazing and suspending agricultural operations during the nesting period.

Further information on causes of change

Agricultural intensification has been associated with the decrease of several grassland breeding wader species (Wilson et al. 2004, 2005a). Conversion of grassland to arable cultivation (Robinson & Sutherland 2002) and grassland intensification, such as reseeding, use of artificial fertilizers, switch from hay to silage and lowering of water levels all decrease the suitability of habitat for breeding waders (Green & Robins 1993). Grass grown for silage presents a tall, dense and uniform sward in spring that is cut earlier than hay meadows, incurring additional losses of nests and chicks (Beintema & Muskens 1987, Kruk et al. 1996, Vickery et al. 2001, Atkinson et al. 2004). Grassland intensification and land drainage have resulted in dry ground with dense, homogenous swards which are rarely used by breeding waders (Smart et al. 2006). High stocking densities bring associated risks of trampling of nests and chicks (Beintema & Muskens 1987, Green 1988), though cattle produce taller swards than sheep, hence providing a better breeding habitat for Redshank (Smart et al. 2006). Studies of godwits and Lapwing have suggested that deteriorating breeding habitat makes wader nests and chicks particularly vulnerable to predators (Bolton et al. 2007, Teunissen et al. 2008, Schekkerman et al. 2009), though predation on Redshank eggs and chicks by native predators remains to be studied. However, in the Uists, where a minor population increase has occurred (Calladine et al. 2015), clutch survival is significantly lower in areas where introduced Hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus are more abundant, and cameras showed that levels of nest predation by Hedgehogs are high in these areas (Calladine et al. 2017).

An intensive field study in Norfolk showed that density of breeding Redshank within coastal and inland grazing marshes was associated with wet features within each field: nest-site selection was associated with clumps of tall vegetation and hatching success was higher in areas of penetrable soil where this species prefers to feed (Smart et al. 2006). On coastal grassland, shallow wet features and vegetation structure have been shown to be important to several species of breeding waders (Vickery et al. 1997, Milsom et al. 2000, 2002, Eglington et al. 2008). Milsom et al. (2002) showed that adult Redshanks prefer to feed in wet rills than dry ones or on open grassland. Soil invertebrates are more accessible when water levels are just below the soil surface (Ausden et al. 2001).

In lowland England, where agricultural intensification has been intense and widespread, Redshank and other grassland-breeding waders have become restricted to areas managed as nature reserves or under agri-environment schemes (AES) (Wilson et al. 2004, 2007, Ausden & Hirons 2002). In Scotland, land use changes leading to a reduction in spring sward height were thought to have been a likely contributory factor to a 25-year decline on mixed farmland in Perthshire (Bell & Calladine 2017).

A study in Estonia found that breeding sites were preferentially located further away from woodland and suggested that woodland planting may have contributed to declines there (Kaasiku et al. 2019); however, no research has been undertaken to investigate whether planting may have contributed to declines in the UK.

Information about conservation actions

The existing evidence suggests that the decline of this species is driven mainly by changes in habitat management, in particular drainage and agricultural intensification, and hence conservation actions such as the restoration of habitat, manipulating water levels, reducing grazing and delaying mowing are likely to be important for Redshank.

Much recent research has focused on the impacts of grazing on breeding success, particularly on saltmarshes, and indicates that heavy grazing is detrimental (Norris et al. 2003; Malpas et al. 2013a) and that even light grazing can reduce breeding success to near zero (Sharps, E. et al. 2015), although there is also evidence that light grazing can sometimes benefit Redshank and that nesting densities tend to be higher on lightly grazed saltmarsh (Norris et al. 2003; Sharps, E. et al. 2016). Therefore, actions to maintain lower grazing densities or time of grazing to reduce pressure during the breeding season should be considered in order to help Redshank ( Sharps, E. et al. 2017). Also in relation to grazing, Smart et al. (2006) found that cattle produce taller swards than sheep, hence providing a better breeding habitat.

A study on the Wadden Sea found that delaying mowing on saltmarshes (until August) would decrease the proportion of broods at risk (Exo et al. 2017) and hence this should also be considered at UK sites where management includes mowing. Delayed mowing of grass grown for silage would also be prudent (see Causes of Change section, above).

Elsewhere, hedgehogs are a specific problem for Redshank and other ground nesting waders on the Uists (Calladine et al. 2015) and control of this introduced non-native species may be required to conserve Redshanks here.

AES management can be successful in increasing breeding pairs of Redshank on grassland fields in Scotland (O'Brien & Wilson 2011) but agri-environment schemes are not currently delivering conservation benefits on saltmarshes and reviewing the management prescriptions to improve their effectiveness is a priority (Mason et al. 2019).

An Estonian study found that apparently suitable sites close to woodland were avoided (Kaasiku et al. 2019); hence habitat improvement should be focused on areas away from woodland and new woodlands should not be planted close to existing sites.

Publications (14)

Loss of breeding waders from key lowland grassland sites in Northern Ireland

Author: Booth Jones, K.A., O’Connell, P., Wolsey, S., Carrington-Cotton, A., Noble, D.G., McCulloch, N. & Calladine, J.R.

Published: 2022

Between the mid-1980s and 2018–2019, Northern Ireland’s lowland wet grasslands saw a 73% decline in their breeding wader populations, from 1,296 to 354 pairs across 74 surveyed sites.

18.07.22

Papers

More Evidence

More evidence from Conservation Evidence.com

Partners

Birdfacts is based on data collected by volunteers participating in surveys that are organised and funded by BTO, RSPB, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, JNCC and other partners.

Citing BirdFacts

If you wish to cite particular content in this page (e.g. a specific value) it is best to use the original sources as linked in the page. For a more general citation of the whole page please use: BTO (20XX) BirdFacts Species: profiles of birds occurring in the United Kingdom. BTO, Thetford (www.bto.org/birdfacts, accessed on xx/xx/xxxx).

Find a Species

Search by common or scientific name