BTO publishes peer-reviewed papers in a wide range of scientific journals, both independently and with our partners. If you are unable to access a scientific paper by a BTO author, please contact us. Search settings Lorg Order by: Order by Latest Oldest Filter by: BTO Author Species Partners Publication Year Project Region Science topic BTO Author Adham Ashton-ButtAilidh BarnesAli JohnstonAllison KewAmanda TraskAmy ChallisAndrew DobsonAndrew JoysAndy ClementsAndy MusgroveAnna RenwickAnne CottonAnthony WetherhillAonghais CookBen DarvillBjörn BeckmannBlaise MartayBob SwannBrian EtheridgeBridget GriffinCallum MacgregorCarl BarimoreCaroline BrightonCat MorrisonCatharine HorswillCharlotte WattsChas HoltChris HewsonChris PollockChris ThaxterChris WernhamClaire BoothbyClare SimmDan ChamberlainDaniel JohnstonDaria DadamDario MassiminoDavid DouglasDavid JarrettDavid NobleDavid NorfolkDawn BalmerDiana de PalacioDorian MossEllie LeechEmily ScraggEmma CaulfieldEsther KettelGary ClewleyGavin SiriwardenaGraham AppletonGraham AustinGreg ConwayHannah HerewardHarry EwingHazel McCambridgeHeidi MellanHenrietta PringleHugh HanmerIain DownieIan HendersonIan WoodwardJacob DaviesJacquie ClarkJames BrayJames ClarkeJames HeywoodJames Pearce-HigginsJennifer BorderJeremy SmithJez BlackburnJoe CooperJohn CalladineJohn MarchantJuliet VickeryKaren WrightKate PlummerKate RiselyKatharine BowgenKatherine Booth JonesKelvin JonesKev LeightonLee BarberLiz HumphreysLucy WrightMadeleine BartonMáire KirklandMandy CookMark GranthamMark HulmeMark MillerMark RehfischMark WilsonMartin SullivanMike TomsNancy OckendonNeil CalbradeNiall BurtonNick MoranNicola BuggNigel ClarkNina O’HanlonPaul NoyesPeadar O'ConnellPeter LackPhil AtkinsonPhilipp Boersch-SupanRachel TaylorRob FullerRob RobinsonRobert JaquesRos GreenRuth WalkerSabine SchäeferSamantha FranksSamuel LangloisSarah EglingtonSarah HarrisShane WolseySimon GillingsSophie BennettStaffan RoosStephen BaillieStephen McAvoyStuart NewsonSu GoughTeresa FrostTim HarrisonViola Ross-Smith Species Arctic SkuaArctic TernAvocetBadgerBar-tailed GodwitBarnacle GooseBatsBewick’s SwanBlack GrouseBlack GuillemotBlack RatBlack-headed GullBlack-tailed GodwitBlack-throated DiverBlackbirdBlackcapBlue TitBrown RatButterflies and mothsBuzzardCanada GooseCarrion CrowChaffinchChiffchaffChoughCommon GullCommon NighthawkCommon TernCormorantCorn BuntingCuckooCurlewCurlew SandpiperDunlinEdible DormouseEiderFieldfareFulmarGannetGatekeeperGolden EagleGolden OrioleGolden PloverGoldeneyeGoldfinchGoosanderGoshawkGreat Black-backed GullGreat Crested GrebeGreat Northern DiverGreat SkuaGreat TitGreater Spotted EagleGreen-veined WhiteGreenfinchGreenshankGrey PloverGuillemotHarvest MouseHazel DormouseHerring GullHobbyHooded CrowHouse MartinHouse MouseHouse SparrowInvertebratesJayKittiwakeKnotLapwingLeach’s PetrelLesser Black-backed GullLesser Spotted WoodpeckerLinnetLittle OwlLittle Ringed PloverLittle TernLong-tailed DuckLong-tailed TitMagpieMallardMammalsManx ShearwaterMarsh TitMediterranean GullMontagu’s HarrierMoorhenNightingaleNightjarNuthatchOriental CuckooOystercatcherPeregrinePheasantPied FlycatcherPuffinPurple SandpiperRavenRazorbillRed-backed ShrikeRed-breasted MerganserRed-legged PartridgeRed-throated DiverRedshankRedstartRedwingRing-necked ParakeetRinged PloverRookRoseate TernRuffSanderlingSandwich TernSemipalmated SandpiperSerinShagShelduckShort-eared OwlShort-toed TreecreeperSiskinSkylarkSlavonian GrebeSmall WhiteSmewSnipeSong ThrushSpotted FlycatcherSpotted RedshankStarlingStorm PetrelSwallowSwiftTawny OwlTealTemminck’s StintTree PipitTree SparrowTurnstoneTurtle DoveVelvet ScoterWhimbrelWhinchatWhite StorkWhite-fronted GooseWhite-tailed EagleWillow TitWillow WarblerWood mouseWood WarblerWoodcockWoodpigeonWrenWryneckYellow-browed WarblerYellow-legged GullYellow-necked Mouse Partners BTO DAERA JNCC Natural England NatureScot RSPB From year Choose2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995 To year Choose2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995 Month Month ChooseJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Day Day Choose12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 Project ChooseBird Ringing SchemeBirds in GreenspacesBirdTrackBlackbirds in GardensBreeding Bird Survey (BBS)BTO Acoustic PipelineCuckoo Tracking ProjectCudyll Cymru – Monitoring Raptors in WalesCudyll Cymru – Monitoring Raptors in Wales (Cymraeg)Gamekeeper Wader TransectsGarden Bird Feeding SurveyGarden BirdWatchGarden Wildlife HealthGoose and Swan Monitoring ProgrammeHeathland Birds SurveyHeronries CensusNest Record SchemeNesting NeighboursSeabird Monitoring ProgrammeVolunteer Mountain Hare SurveyWader CalendarWaterways Breeding Bird SurveyWetland Bird Survey (WeBS)Winter Bird SurveyWoodcock Survey Region UK East of England South East England East Midlands South West Ireland London West Midlands Island territories North East Yorkshire and the Humber Northern Ireland North West Scotland Wales Science topic Biodiversity Birds and people Climate change Conservation Demographics Farmland Grassland Habitats International Marine Migration Monitoring Non-natives Other wildlife Population dynamics Predators Renewables Species interactions Technology Tracking Upland Urban Wetland Wildlife health Woodland Search Reset Long-term trends of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) show widespread contamination of a bird-eating predator, the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in Britain Author: Broughton, R.K., Searle, K.R., Walker, L.A., Potter, E.D., Glória Pereira, M., Carter, H., Sleep, D., Noble, D.G., Butler, A. & Johnson, A.C. Published: 2022 Rodenticides are widely used to control small mammal populations. The potential impacts of these compounds on non-target species, such as rodent-specialist predators, have long been a cause for concern. There is also evidence that species that do not usually feed on small mammals, such as bird-specialist predators, are exposed. In the most comprehensive study of its kind, this paper examines the presence of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) over 20 years in the British Sparrowhawk population, in order to establish how contamination patterns vary over time, space and life stage. Scientists from the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, BTO and Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland examined the carcasses of 259 Sparrowhawks which died between 1995 and 2015. Using preserved liver samples, they searched for traces of five different SGARs which are used in the UK. SGARs are normally deployed in bait to kill rodents. They are highly toxic and came about because many rodent populations developed a resistance to warfarin and other first generation anticoagulant rodenticides. The scientists wanted to know if SGAR contamination differed between male and female Sparrowhawks or between birds at different life stages (i.e. adults and juveniles). They also looked for any regional differences in the concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks and whether these varied over time. At least one SGAR was found in 81% of the Sparrowhawks studied. The most common compound detected, in 72% of the sampled birds, was difenacoum, a widely available rodenticide. These results suggest widespread contamination of the British Sparrowhawk population. This is significant because although Sparrowhawks only rarely take small mammals, the prevalence of SGARs was similar to that of the Barn Owl, a rodent-specialist. SGARs are therefore reaching predators via the consumption of non-rodent prey, likely through preying on songbirds which have been feeding from bait traps. Although SGAR contamination was as widespread in the Sparrowhawks as a rodent-specialist species, Sparrowhawks had lower concentrations of the compounds in their systems. The levels were considered sub-lethal in almost all sampled Sparrowhawks (97%), but this might still be cause for concern; even low SGAR burdens are thought to stunt growth in Kestrels, which may affect recruitment into the adult population. Given the lack of data on the effects of sub-lethal concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks, it is difficult to say for sure how these compounds might impact the birds during their lives. As the least urbanised and least arable region, it was unsurprising that Scotland’s Sparrowhawks had the lowest SGAR exposure in the study. In contrast south-eastern England had the highest concentrations, mostly likely because it is so heavily developed by humans. SGAR concentrations increased in both regions over time, but more strongly in south-eastern England. Concentrations also varied over the course of an individual’s lifespan. As expected, adult birds had higher concentrations than juveniles, likely due to a greater opportunity to accumulate SGARs over time. Contrary to predictions, male birds tended to have greater levels compared to females, possibly because female Sparrowhawks can transfer some of their SGAR load to eggs. An experimental study on Sparrowhawks would be needed to confirm this theory. Never before has a study on rodenticides included data over such a long period or examined the importance of demographics such as age or sex. These results are extremely valuable, as we strive to understand the nature of SGAR exposure in non-target species. In particular, they demonstrate the widespread nature of contamination in the UK, which has implications for SGAR use on a global scale. 23.09.22 Papers Connectivity between countries established by landbirds and raptors migrating along the African-Eurasian flyway Author: Guilherme, J.L., Jones, V.R., Catry, I., Beal, M., Dias, M.P., Oppel, S., Vickery, J.A., Hewson, C.M., Butchart, S.H.M. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. Published: 2022 The importance of the African-Eurasian flyway to long-distance migratory populations is well known, as are the many threats that the birds face on their journeys. Recent advances in tracking technology have provided vital information for conservation action, for example revealing the routes and stopover sites birds use, but work to address any threats identified has been hindered by fragmented and inaccessible datasets. Can bringing these studies into a single resource reveal new information that would enable more effective conservation action? 08.09.22 Papers View on journal website Habitat-use influences severe disease-mediated population declines in two of the most common garden bird species in Great Britain Author: Hanmer, H.J., Cunningham, A.A., John, S.K., Magregor, S.K., Robinson, R.A., Seilern-Moy, K., Siriwardena, G.M. & Lawson, B. Published: 2022 Infectious disease has been linked to population declines across multiple taxa, including birds, and it is important that we understand how anthropogenic factors, such as urbanisation and the provision of supplementary food at garden feeding stations, may influence its occurrence and impact. 06.09.22 Papers Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to marine traffic in the near-shore environment Author: Jarrett, D., Calladine, J., Cook, A.S.C.P., Upton, A., Williams, J.,Williams, S., Wilson, J.M., Wilson, M.W., Woodward, I. & Humphreys, E.M. Published: 2022 Marine traffic is increasing globally, but there has been little research investigating the impact of this disturbance, particularly for non-breeding populations in near-shore environments. This study observed the behaviour of 11 seabird species in response to winter ferry passage around Orkney, increasing the evidence base available to inform impact assessments, planning and policy in the marine environment. 02.09.22 Papers View on journal website Differential changes in life cycle-event phenology provide a window into regional population declines Author: Hanmer, H.J., Boersch-Supan, P.H. & Robinson, R.A. Published: 2022 New research from BTO investigates the effects of climate change on Willow Warblers. The findings, based on volunteers’ ringing and nest recording data, help to explain why birds breeding in different parts of Britain are being affected in different ways. 24.08.22 Papers Breeding bird population trends during 2013–2019 inside and outside of European Badger control areas in England Author: Ward, C.V., Heydon, M., Lakin, I., Sullivan, A.J. & Siriwardena, G.M. Published: 2022 It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Since 2013, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has licensed culling of Badger populations in several English regions. This programme is part of a government policy response to Bovine Tuberculosis, a disease that has major implications for the British cattle farming industry. Between 2013 and 2019, over 100,000 Badgers were culled. It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Badgers have a varied diet that includes earthworms, slugs, fruits, small mammals and birds, the latter mostly comprising eggs or chicks in nests located on or close to the ground. Levels of predation on the nests of birds could be directly affected by the removal of Badgers, or indirectly affected by population responses of other predators following their release from competition with Badgers. In turn, it is then possible (but by no means certain) that Badger removal will affect bird population trends. By examining population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds, inside and outside of cull areas, this study set out to assess possible effects of Badger removal on bird populations. The study extends the work of Kettel et al. (2021), using data from two additional culling years, further regions under culling treatment and a measure of local cull intensity, all of which should increase the power of the study to identify possible effects. The new study was able to set a minimum sample size that is double that used previously, which increases the robustness of the approach. This study provides an important further assessment of a high-profile policy initiative, using the best data that are available. As before, the study design was limited by the geographical pattern in which culling has been introduced (i.e. it has been done in some areas but not in others nearby, which would facilitate clear comparisons), but it is important to explore the available, relevant data as far as possible, to glean the best evidence available. It is not intended to provide a definitive evaluation of the effects of badger removal. Using data from the BTO/JNCC/RSPB Breeding Bird Survey, the authors examined the population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds over the period 2013–2019, and following five years of baseline data preceding commencement of culling (2008—2012). This enabled them to measure the effects of Badger removal on population change in the studied bird species, as far as the data allowed. Direct or indirect effects of Badger removal would be expected to be greatest on ground-nesting birds. The study found little evidence to indicate consistent, community-level effects of Badger removal on the populations of ground-nesting birds. Ground-nesting birds will be predated by Badgers as well as by other predators, and populations of these other predators may themselves be influenced by Badger numbers. If the studied bird populations are regulated by predation, then it is likely to be by a complex suite of predators. However, it is also quite likely that predation plays no such role, and that factors such as food availability or land management are more important. All this means that changing the abundance of one predator may well have no overall effect on prey numbers in many contexts, and that the effects of removing a predator through culling will be difficult to explore definitively. In analyses like this, the lack of an experimental study structure and of available information for other important variables (such as the density of Badgers pre-culling and Badger dispersal patterns) makes interpretation difficult. There are several reasons why effects of Badger removal might not have been found here, including limitations with the study design and a genuine lack of any real impact on bird populations. However, it is clear that there have not been strong, clear effects on species that should be more vulnerable. Despite the limitations of the analysis, this study very clearly demonstrates the value of the Breeding Bird Survey dataset in observing long-term population trends, and one way in which it can be used in helping to monitor possible effects of large-scale policy measures on breeding birds. 15.08.22 Papers Read this paper The effects of a decade of agri-environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies Author: Redhead, J.W., Hinsley, S.A., Botham, M.S., Broughton, R.K., Freeman, S.N., Bellamy, P.E., Siriwardena, G., Randle, Z., Nowakowski, M., Heard, M.S. & Pywell, R.F. Published: 2022 Food production and wildlife conservation are often thought of as incompatible goals, and it is rare that conservation studies consider both economics and long-term changes in ecology. However, a decade-long study at a commercial arable farm in Buckinghamshire has found that agri-environment schemes significantly increased local bird and butterfly populations without damaging food production, offering hope for the UK’s farmland birds and butterflies. 01.08.22 Papers Pagination First page First Previous page Previous … Duilleag 20 Duilleag 21 Duilleag 22 Duilleag 23 Duilleag 24 Duilleag 25 Duilleag 26 Duilleag 27 Duilleag 28 … Next page Next Last page Last
Search settings Lorg Order by: Order by Latest Oldest Filter by: BTO Author Species Partners Publication Year Project Region Science topic BTO Author Adham Ashton-ButtAilidh BarnesAli JohnstonAllison KewAmanda TraskAmy ChallisAndrew DobsonAndrew JoysAndy ClementsAndy MusgroveAnna RenwickAnne CottonAnthony WetherhillAonghais CookBen DarvillBjörn BeckmannBlaise MartayBob SwannBrian EtheridgeBridget GriffinCallum MacgregorCarl BarimoreCaroline BrightonCat MorrisonCatharine HorswillCharlotte WattsChas HoltChris HewsonChris PollockChris ThaxterChris WernhamClaire BoothbyClare SimmDan ChamberlainDaniel JohnstonDaria DadamDario MassiminoDavid DouglasDavid JarrettDavid NobleDavid NorfolkDawn BalmerDiana de PalacioDorian MossEllie LeechEmily ScraggEmma CaulfieldEsther KettelGary ClewleyGavin SiriwardenaGraham AppletonGraham AustinGreg ConwayHannah HerewardHarry EwingHazel McCambridgeHeidi MellanHenrietta PringleHugh HanmerIain DownieIan HendersonIan WoodwardJacob DaviesJacquie ClarkJames BrayJames ClarkeJames HeywoodJames Pearce-HigginsJennifer BorderJeremy SmithJez BlackburnJoe CooperJohn CalladineJohn MarchantJuliet VickeryKaren WrightKate PlummerKate RiselyKatharine BowgenKatherine Booth JonesKelvin JonesKev LeightonLee BarberLiz HumphreysLucy WrightMadeleine BartonMáire KirklandMandy CookMark GranthamMark HulmeMark MillerMark RehfischMark WilsonMartin SullivanMike TomsNancy OckendonNeil CalbradeNiall BurtonNick MoranNicola BuggNigel ClarkNina O’HanlonPaul NoyesPeadar O'ConnellPeter LackPhil AtkinsonPhilipp Boersch-SupanRachel TaylorRob FullerRob RobinsonRobert JaquesRos GreenRuth WalkerSabine SchäeferSamantha FranksSamuel LangloisSarah EglingtonSarah HarrisShane WolseySimon GillingsSophie BennettStaffan RoosStephen BaillieStephen McAvoyStuart NewsonSu GoughTeresa FrostTim HarrisonViola Ross-Smith Species Arctic SkuaArctic TernAvocetBadgerBar-tailed GodwitBarnacle GooseBatsBewick’s SwanBlack GrouseBlack GuillemotBlack RatBlack-headed GullBlack-tailed GodwitBlack-throated DiverBlackbirdBlackcapBlue TitBrown RatButterflies and mothsBuzzardCanada GooseCarrion CrowChaffinchChiffchaffChoughCommon GullCommon NighthawkCommon TernCormorantCorn BuntingCuckooCurlewCurlew SandpiperDunlinEdible DormouseEiderFieldfareFulmarGannetGatekeeperGolden EagleGolden OrioleGolden PloverGoldeneyeGoldfinchGoosanderGoshawkGreat Black-backed GullGreat Crested GrebeGreat Northern DiverGreat SkuaGreat TitGreater Spotted EagleGreen-veined WhiteGreenfinchGreenshankGrey PloverGuillemotHarvest MouseHazel DormouseHerring GullHobbyHooded CrowHouse MartinHouse MouseHouse SparrowInvertebratesJayKittiwakeKnotLapwingLeach’s PetrelLesser Black-backed GullLesser Spotted WoodpeckerLinnetLittle OwlLittle Ringed PloverLittle TernLong-tailed DuckLong-tailed TitMagpieMallardMammalsManx ShearwaterMarsh TitMediterranean GullMontagu’s HarrierMoorhenNightingaleNightjarNuthatchOriental CuckooOystercatcherPeregrinePheasantPied FlycatcherPuffinPurple SandpiperRavenRazorbillRed-backed ShrikeRed-breasted MerganserRed-legged PartridgeRed-throated DiverRedshankRedstartRedwingRing-necked ParakeetRinged PloverRookRoseate TernRuffSanderlingSandwich TernSemipalmated SandpiperSerinShagShelduckShort-eared OwlShort-toed TreecreeperSiskinSkylarkSlavonian GrebeSmall WhiteSmewSnipeSong ThrushSpotted FlycatcherSpotted RedshankStarlingStorm PetrelSwallowSwiftTawny OwlTealTemminck’s StintTree PipitTree SparrowTurnstoneTurtle DoveVelvet ScoterWhimbrelWhinchatWhite StorkWhite-fronted GooseWhite-tailed EagleWillow TitWillow WarblerWood mouseWood WarblerWoodcockWoodpigeonWrenWryneckYellow-browed WarblerYellow-legged GullYellow-necked Mouse Partners BTO DAERA JNCC Natural England NatureScot RSPB From year Choose2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995 To year Choose2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995 Month Month ChooseJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Day Day Choose12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 Project ChooseBird Ringing SchemeBirds in GreenspacesBirdTrackBlackbirds in GardensBreeding Bird Survey (BBS)BTO Acoustic PipelineCuckoo Tracking ProjectCudyll Cymru – Monitoring Raptors in WalesCudyll Cymru – Monitoring Raptors in Wales (Cymraeg)Gamekeeper Wader TransectsGarden Bird Feeding SurveyGarden BirdWatchGarden Wildlife HealthGoose and Swan Monitoring ProgrammeHeathland Birds SurveyHeronries CensusNest Record SchemeNesting NeighboursSeabird Monitoring ProgrammeVolunteer Mountain Hare SurveyWader CalendarWaterways Breeding Bird SurveyWetland Bird Survey (WeBS)Winter Bird SurveyWoodcock Survey Region UK East of England South East England East Midlands South West Ireland London West Midlands Island territories North East Yorkshire and the Humber Northern Ireland North West Scotland Wales Science topic Biodiversity Birds and people Climate change Conservation Demographics Farmland Grassland Habitats International Marine Migration Monitoring Non-natives Other wildlife Population dynamics Predators Renewables Species interactions Technology Tracking Upland Urban Wetland Wildlife health Woodland Search Reset Long-term trends of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) show widespread contamination of a bird-eating predator, the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in Britain Author: Broughton, R.K., Searle, K.R., Walker, L.A., Potter, E.D., Glória Pereira, M., Carter, H., Sleep, D., Noble, D.G., Butler, A. & Johnson, A.C. Published: 2022 Rodenticides are widely used to control small mammal populations. The potential impacts of these compounds on non-target species, such as rodent-specialist predators, have long been a cause for concern. There is also evidence that species that do not usually feed on small mammals, such as bird-specialist predators, are exposed. In the most comprehensive study of its kind, this paper examines the presence of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) over 20 years in the British Sparrowhawk population, in order to establish how contamination patterns vary over time, space and life stage. Scientists from the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, BTO and Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland examined the carcasses of 259 Sparrowhawks which died between 1995 and 2015. Using preserved liver samples, they searched for traces of five different SGARs which are used in the UK. SGARs are normally deployed in bait to kill rodents. They are highly toxic and came about because many rodent populations developed a resistance to warfarin and other first generation anticoagulant rodenticides. The scientists wanted to know if SGAR contamination differed between male and female Sparrowhawks or between birds at different life stages (i.e. adults and juveniles). They also looked for any regional differences in the concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks and whether these varied over time. At least one SGAR was found in 81% of the Sparrowhawks studied. The most common compound detected, in 72% of the sampled birds, was difenacoum, a widely available rodenticide. These results suggest widespread contamination of the British Sparrowhawk population. This is significant because although Sparrowhawks only rarely take small mammals, the prevalence of SGARs was similar to that of the Barn Owl, a rodent-specialist. SGARs are therefore reaching predators via the consumption of non-rodent prey, likely through preying on songbirds which have been feeding from bait traps. Although SGAR contamination was as widespread in the Sparrowhawks as a rodent-specialist species, Sparrowhawks had lower concentrations of the compounds in their systems. The levels were considered sub-lethal in almost all sampled Sparrowhawks (97%), but this might still be cause for concern; even low SGAR burdens are thought to stunt growth in Kestrels, which may affect recruitment into the adult population. Given the lack of data on the effects of sub-lethal concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks, it is difficult to say for sure how these compounds might impact the birds during their lives. As the least urbanised and least arable region, it was unsurprising that Scotland’s Sparrowhawks had the lowest SGAR exposure in the study. In contrast south-eastern England had the highest concentrations, mostly likely because it is so heavily developed by humans. SGAR concentrations increased in both regions over time, but more strongly in south-eastern England. Concentrations also varied over the course of an individual’s lifespan. As expected, adult birds had higher concentrations than juveniles, likely due to a greater opportunity to accumulate SGARs over time. Contrary to predictions, male birds tended to have greater levels compared to females, possibly because female Sparrowhawks can transfer some of their SGAR load to eggs. An experimental study on Sparrowhawks would be needed to confirm this theory. Never before has a study on rodenticides included data over such a long period or examined the importance of demographics such as age or sex. These results are extremely valuable, as we strive to understand the nature of SGAR exposure in non-target species. In particular, they demonstrate the widespread nature of contamination in the UK, which has implications for SGAR use on a global scale. 23.09.22 Papers Connectivity between countries established by landbirds and raptors migrating along the African-Eurasian flyway Author: Guilherme, J.L., Jones, V.R., Catry, I., Beal, M., Dias, M.P., Oppel, S., Vickery, J.A., Hewson, C.M., Butchart, S.H.M. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. Published: 2022 The importance of the African-Eurasian flyway to long-distance migratory populations is well known, as are the many threats that the birds face on their journeys. Recent advances in tracking technology have provided vital information for conservation action, for example revealing the routes and stopover sites birds use, but work to address any threats identified has been hindered by fragmented and inaccessible datasets. Can bringing these studies into a single resource reveal new information that would enable more effective conservation action? 08.09.22 Papers View on journal website Habitat-use influences severe disease-mediated population declines in two of the most common garden bird species in Great Britain Author: Hanmer, H.J., Cunningham, A.A., John, S.K., Magregor, S.K., Robinson, R.A., Seilern-Moy, K., Siriwardena, G.M. & Lawson, B. Published: 2022 Infectious disease has been linked to population declines across multiple taxa, including birds, and it is important that we understand how anthropogenic factors, such as urbanisation and the provision of supplementary food at garden feeding stations, may influence its occurrence and impact. 06.09.22 Papers Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to marine traffic in the near-shore environment Author: Jarrett, D., Calladine, J., Cook, A.S.C.P., Upton, A., Williams, J.,Williams, S., Wilson, J.M., Wilson, M.W., Woodward, I. & Humphreys, E.M. Published: 2022 Marine traffic is increasing globally, but there has been little research investigating the impact of this disturbance, particularly for non-breeding populations in near-shore environments. This study observed the behaviour of 11 seabird species in response to winter ferry passage around Orkney, increasing the evidence base available to inform impact assessments, planning and policy in the marine environment. 02.09.22 Papers View on journal website Differential changes in life cycle-event phenology provide a window into regional population declines Author: Hanmer, H.J., Boersch-Supan, P.H. & Robinson, R.A. Published: 2022 New research from BTO investigates the effects of climate change on Willow Warblers. The findings, based on volunteers’ ringing and nest recording data, help to explain why birds breeding in different parts of Britain are being affected in different ways. 24.08.22 Papers Breeding bird population trends during 2013–2019 inside and outside of European Badger control areas in England Author: Ward, C.V., Heydon, M., Lakin, I., Sullivan, A.J. & Siriwardena, G.M. Published: 2022 It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Since 2013, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has licensed culling of Badger populations in several English regions. This programme is part of a government policy response to Bovine Tuberculosis, a disease that has major implications for the British cattle farming industry. Between 2013 and 2019, over 100,000 Badgers were culled. It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Badgers have a varied diet that includes earthworms, slugs, fruits, small mammals and birds, the latter mostly comprising eggs or chicks in nests located on or close to the ground. Levels of predation on the nests of birds could be directly affected by the removal of Badgers, or indirectly affected by population responses of other predators following their release from competition with Badgers. In turn, it is then possible (but by no means certain) that Badger removal will affect bird population trends. By examining population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds, inside and outside of cull areas, this study set out to assess possible effects of Badger removal on bird populations. The study extends the work of Kettel et al. (2021), using data from two additional culling years, further regions under culling treatment and a measure of local cull intensity, all of which should increase the power of the study to identify possible effects. The new study was able to set a minimum sample size that is double that used previously, which increases the robustness of the approach. This study provides an important further assessment of a high-profile policy initiative, using the best data that are available. As before, the study design was limited by the geographical pattern in which culling has been introduced (i.e. it has been done in some areas but not in others nearby, which would facilitate clear comparisons), but it is important to explore the available, relevant data as far as possible, to glean the best evidence available. It is not intended to provide a definitive evaluation of the effects of badger removal. Using data from the BTO/JNCC/RSPB Breeding Bird Survey, the authors examined the population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds over the period 2013–2019, and following five years of baseline data preceding commencement of culling (2008—2012). This enabled them to measure the effects of Badger removal on population change in the studied bird species, as far as the data allowed. Direct or indirect effects of Badger removal would be expected to be greatest on ground-nesting birds. The study found little evidence to indicate consistent, community-level effects of Badger removal on the populations of ground-nesting birds. Ground-nesting birds will be predated by Badgers as well as by other predators, and populations of these other predators may themselves be influenced by Badger numbers. If the studied bird populations are regulated by predation, then it is likely to be by a complex suite of predators. However, it is also quite likely that predation plays no such role, and that factors such as food availability or land management are more important. All this means that changing the abundance of one predator may well have no overall effect on prey numbers in many contexts, and that the effects of removing a predator through culling will be difficult to explore definitively. In analyses like this, the lack of an experimental study structure and of available information for other important variables (such as the density of Badgers pre-culling and Badger dispersal patterns) makes interpretation difficult. There are several reasons why effects of Badger removal might not have been found here, including limitations with the study design and a genuine lack of any real impact on bird populations. However, it is clear that there have not been strong, clear effects on species that should be more vulnerable. Despite the limitations of the analysis, this study very clearly demonstrates the value of the Breeding Bird Survey dataset in observing long-term population trends, and one way in which it can be used in helping to monitor possible effects of large-scale policy measures on breeding birds. 15.08.22 Papers Read this paper The effects of a decade of agri-environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies Author: Redhead, J.W., Hinsley, S.A., Botham, M.S., Broughton, R.K., Freeman, S.N., Bellamy, P.E., Siriwardena, G., Randle, Z., Nowakowski, M., Heard, M.S. & Pywell, R.F. Published: 2022 Food production and wildlife conservation are often thought of as incompatible goals, and it is rare that conservation studies consider both economics and long-term changes in ecology. However, a decade-long study at a commercial arable farm in Buckinghamshire has found that agri-environment schemes significantly increased local bird and butterfly populations without damaging food production, offering hope for the UK’s farmland birds and butterflies. 01.08.22 Papers Pagination First page First Previous page Previous … Duilleag 20 Duilleag 21 Duilleag 22 Duilleag 23 Duilleag 24 Duilleag 25 Duilleag 26 Duilleag 27 Duilleag 28 … Next page Next Last page Last
Long-term trends of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) show widespread contamination of a bird-eating predator, the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in Britain Author: Broughton, R.K., Searle, K.R., Walker, L.A., Potter, E.D., Glória Pereira, M., Carter, H., Sleep, D., Noble, D.G., Butler, A. & Johnson, A.C. Published: 2022 Rodenticides are widely used to control small mammal populations. The potential impacts of these compounds on non-target species, such as rodent-specialist predators, have long been a cause for concern. There is also evidence that species that do not usually feed on small mammals, such as bird-specialist predators, are exposed. In the most comprehensive study of its kind, this paper examines the presence of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) over 20 years in the British Sparrowhawk population, in order to establish how contamination patterns vary over time, space and life stage. Scientists from the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, BTO and Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland examined the carcasses of 259 Sparrowhawks which died between 1995 and 2015. Using preserved liver samples, they searched for traces of five different SGARs which are used in the UK. SGARs are normally deployed in bait to kill rodents. They are highly toxic and came about because many rodent populations developed a resistance to warfarin and other first generation anticoagulant rodenticides. The scientists wanted to know if SGAR contamination differed between male and female Sparrowhawks or between birds at different life stages (i.e. adults and juveniles). They also looked for any regional differences in the concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks and whether these varied over time. At least one SGAR was found in 81% of the Sparrowhawks studied. The most common compound detected, in 72% of the sampled birds, was difenacoum, a widely available rodenticide. These results suggest widespread contamination of the British Sparrowhawk population. This is significant because although Sparrowhawks only rarely take small mammals, the prevalence of SGARs was similar to that of the Barn Owl, a rodent-specialist. SGARs are therefore reaching predators via the consumption of non-rodent prey, likely through preying on songbirds which have been feeding from bait traps. Although SGAR contamination was as widespread in the Sparrowhawks as a rodent-specialist species, Sparrowhawks had lower concentrations of the compounds in their systems. The levels were considered sub-lethal in almost all sampled Sparrowhawks (97%), but this might still be cause for concern; even low SGAR burdens are thought to stunt growth in Kestrels, which may affect recruitment into the adult population. Given the lack of data on the effects of sub-lethal concentrations of SGARs in Sparrowhawks, it is difficult to say for sure how these compounds might impact the birds during their lives. As the least urbanised and least arable region, it was unsurprising that Scotland’s Sparrowhawks had the lowest SGAR exposure in the study. In contrast south-eastern England had the highest concentrations, mostly likely because it is so heavily developed by humans. SGAR concentrations increased in both regions over time, but more strongly in south-eastern England. Concentrations also varied over the course of an individual’s lifespan. As expected, adult birds had higher concentrations than juveniles, likely due to a greater opportunity to accumulate SGARs over time. Contrary to predictions, male birds tended to have greater levels compared to females, possibly because female Sparrowhawks can transfer some of their SGAR load to eggs. An experimental study on Sparrowhawks would be needed to confirm this theory. Never before has a study on rodenticides included data over such a long period or examined the importance of demographics such as age or sex. These results are extremely valuable, as we strive to understand the nature of SGAR exposure in non-target species. In particular, they demonstrate the widespread nature of contamination in the UK, which has implications for SGAR use on a global scale. 23.09.22 Papers
Connectivity between countries established by landbirds and raptors migrating along the African-Eurasian flyway Author: Guilherme, J.L., Jones, V.R., Catry, I., Beal, M., Dias, M.P., Oppel, S., Vickery, J.A., Hewson, C.M., Butchart, S.H.M. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. Published: 2022 The importance of the African-Eurasian flyway to long-distance migratory populations is well known, as are the many threats that the birds face on their journeys. Recent advances in tracking technology have provided vital information for conservation action, for example revealing the routes and stopover sites birds use, but work to address any threats identified has been hindered by fragmented and inaccessible datasets. Can bringing these studies into a single resource reveal new information that would enable more effective conservation action? 08.09.22 Papers View on journal website
Habitat-use influences severe disease-mediated population declines in two of the most common garden bird species in Great Britain Author: Hanmer, H.J., Cunningham, A.A., John, S.K., Magregor, S.K., Robinson, R.A., Seilern-Moy, K., Siriwardena, G.M. & Lawson, B. Published: 2022 Infectious disease has been linked to population declines across multiple taxa, including birds, and it is important that we understand how anthropogenic factors, such as urbanisation and the provision of supplementary food at garden feeding stations, may influence its occurrence and impact. 06.09.22 Papers
Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to marine traffic in the near-shore environment Author: Jarrett, D., Calladine, J., Cook, A.S.C.P., Upton, A., Williams, J.,Williams, S., Wilson, J.M., Wilson, M.W., Woodward, I. & Humphreys, E.M. Published: 2022 Marine traffic is increasing globally, but there has been little research investigating the impact of this disturbance, particularly for non-breeding populations in near-shore environments. This study observed the behaviour of 11 seabird species in response to winter ferry passage around Orkney, increasing the evidence base available to inform impact assessments, planning and policy in the marine environment. 02.09.22 Papers View on journal website
Differential changes in life cycle-event phenology provide a window into regional population declines Author: Hanmer, H.J., Boersch-Supan, P.H. & Robinson, R.A. Published: 2022 New research from BTO investigates the effects of climate change on Willow Warblers. The findings, based on volunteers’ ringing and nest recording data, help to explain why birds breeding in different parts of Britain are being affected in different ways. 24.08.22 Papers
Breeding bird population trends during 2013–2019 inside and outside of European Badger control areas in England Author: Ward, C.V., Heydon, M., Lakin, I., Sullivan, A.J. & Siriwardena, G.M. Published: 2022 It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Since 2013, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has licensed culling of Badger populations in several English regions. This programme is part of a government policy response to Bovine Tuberculosis, a disease that has major implications for the British cattle farming industry. Between 2013 and 2019, over 100,000 Badgers were culled. It is important to evaluate the ecological impact of severely depressing the population of a widespread predator within large areas of the country. Badgers have a varied diet that includes earthworms, slugs, fruits, small mammals and birds, the latter mostly comprising eggs or chicks in nests located on or close to the ground. Levels of predation on the nests of birds could be directly affected by the removal of Badgers, or indirectly affected by population responses of other predators following their release from competition with Badgers. In turn, it is then possible (but by no means certain) that Badger removal will affect bird population trends. By examining population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds, inside and outside of cull areas, this study set out to assess possible effects of Badger removal on bird populations. The study extends the work of Kettel et al. (2021), using data from two additional culling years, further regions under culling treatment and a measure of local cull intensity, all of which should increase the power of the study to identify possible effects. The new study was able to set a minimum sample size that is double that used previously, which increases the robustness of the approach. This study provides an important further assessment of a high-profile policy initiative, using the best data that are available. As before, the study design was limited by the geographical pattern in which culling has been introduced (i.e. it has been done in some areas but not in others nearby, which would facilitate clear comparisons), but it is important to explore the available, relevant data as far as possible, to glean the best evidence available. It is not intended to provide a definitive evaluation of the effects of badger removal. Using data from the BTO/JNCC/RSPB Breeding Bird Survey, the authors examined the population growth rates of both ground-nesting and non-ground-nesting breeding birds over the period 2013–2019, and following five years of baseline data preceding commencement of culling (2008—2012). This enabled them to measure the effects of Badger removal on population change in the studied bird species, as far as the data allowed. Direct or indirect effects of Badger removal would be expected to be greatest on ground-nesting birds. The study found little evidence to indicate consistent, community-level effects of Badger removal on the populations of ground-nesting birds. Ground-nesting birds will be predated by Badgers as well as by other predators, and populations of these other predators may themselves be influenced by Badger numbers. If the studied bird populations are regulated by predation, then it is likely to be by a complex suite of predators. However, it is also quite likely that predation plays no such role, and that factors such as food availability or land management are more important. All this means that changing the abundance of one predator may well have no overall effect on prey numbers in many contexts, and that the effects of removing a predator through culling will be difficult to explore definitively. In analyses like this, the lack of an experimental study structure and of available information for other important variables (such as the density of Badgers pre-culling and Badger dispersal patterns) makes interpretation difficult. There are several reasons why effects of Badger removal might not have been found here, including limitations with the study design and a genuine lack of any real impact on bird populations. However, it is clear that there have not been strong, clear effects on species that should be more vulnerable. Despite the limitations of the analysis, this study very clearly demonstrates the value of the Breeding Bird Survey dataset in observing long-term population trends, and one way in which it can be used in helping to monitor possible effects of large-scale policy measures on breeding birds. 15.08.22 Papers Read this paper
The effects of a decade of agri-environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies Author: Redhead, J.W., Hinsley, S.A., Botham, M.S., Broughton, R.K., Freeman, S.N., Bellamy, P.E., Siriwardena, G., Randle, Z., Nowakowski, M., Heard, M.S. & Pywell, R.F. Published: 2022 Food production and wildlife conservation are often thought of as incompatible goals, and it is rare that conservation studies consider both economics and long-term changes in ecology. However, a decade-long study at a commercial arable farm in Buckinghamshire has found that agri-environment schemes significantly increased local bird and butterfly populations without damaging food production, offering hope for the UK’s farmland birds and butterflies. 01.08.22 Papers