Assessing drivers of winter abundance change in  Eurasian Curlews Numenius arquata in England and Wales

Curlew. Liz Cutting

Author(s): Woodward, I.D., Austin, G.E., Boersch-Supan, P.H., Thaxter, C.B. & Burton, N.H.K

Published: April 2022  

Journal: Bird Study

Digital Identifier No. (DOI): 10.1080/00063657.2022.2049205

View journal article

BTO research, funded by the Curlew Appeal, investigated the factors affecting wintering Curlew abundance on estuaries in England and Wales. The findings suggest that short and long term trends in these local populations are not heavily influenced by local winter conditions on and around estuaries, indicating that the current declines are driven by factors that impact summer breeding success. 

Abstract

Capsule: We assessed annual changes in Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata wintering numbers at estuaries in England and Wales over 40 years against local and broadscale factors. Long-term trends likely reflect the cessation of hunting, but potentially also distributional changes associated with milder winters and changes in breeding success. Aims: To investigate whether local or broadscale factors might affect site-level annual abundance changes in Curlews in England and Wales.

Methods: Relationships between Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) counts from 46 estuaries from 1974/ 75 to 2016/17 and environmental data were assessed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models.

Results: The winter abundance trend of Curlews in England and Wales closely matched the decline of breeding populations since the mid-1990s. However, there are clear differences in the trends prior to this. Our analysis suggests that winter counts were influenced by the cessation of hunting and by weather, with abundance decreasing during cold winters and increasing the following winter. The influence of severe weather was less pronounced in the immediate aftermath of the hunting ban. An increase in numbers in the east of the UK also occurred during this period. No effects were detected for other environmental variables, but this may reflect the fact that only static variation between sites was tested for these variables rather than change.

Conclusion: The increase in wintering Curlew numbers in the UK during the 1980s and early 1990s likely reflects a positive response to the cessation of hunting, but also a wider redistribution associated with milder winters across the European wintering range. Winter temperatures influenced annual abundance changes at individual sites, although impacts on detectability are difficult to disentangle from impacts on survival using WeBS counts alone. Factors operating during the breeding season are likely to be the main drivers of the current population decline.

Using WeBS count data from estuarine sites between 1947 - 1975 and 2016 - 2017, the researchers compared Curlew numbers with potential influencing factors.

Trends from the WeBS count data show increasing numbers of wintering Curlew during the 1980s, which are likely due to the ban on Curlew hunting which was introduced in 1982. Subsequently, the data shows decreases at wintering sites; these are likely to have been caused by low breeding success. This has been identified by a number of studies as a driver of the current decline, but could not be included in this study as there is insufficient data linking the breeding and wintering grounds for individual Curlew. Additionally, the researchers noted a shift in distribution from the west to the east of the UK, which may relate to changes in wintering areas driven by climate change.

The models also showed that Curlew numbers reported in WeBS counts were affected by very cold winter weather, as might be expected. However, the analysis did not identify any clear evidence that changes in overall numbers at estuarine sites have been driven by other local conditions like water quality, estuary morphology, disturbance or the amount of grassland habitat. This supports other BTO research which has suggested that Curlew declines are predominantly caused by factors operating during the breeding season, and that most estuaries are currently providing enough quality habitat to support wintering Curlews.

The current focus on conservation actions during the breeding season is therefore thought to be the best approach to restore Curlew populations. However, these findings should not generate complacency about the condition of wintering sites; protecting estuaries to maintain a network of good quality wintering sites for Curlews is vitally important whilst breeding productivity remains extremely low, and will continue to be important in the future. Any changes to estuaries that drive lower winter survival rates could prove disastrous for this struggling species.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This analysis was made possible by the many hours of survey work carried out by WeBS volunteers at the 46 estuaries in England and Wales which were used in this analysis, and by the generous contributions made to the BTO’s Curlew Appeal. Many other volunteers across the UK and Europe have also contributed to the production of the WeBS, BBS, and EBBC trends presented here. WeBS is a partnership jointly funded by the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), in association with the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust; and the Breeding Bird Survey is a partnership between the BTO, JNCC, and RSPB. Thanks also to James Pearce-Higgins for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper and to Aonghais Cook, Sam Franks, Teresa Frost, Liz Humphreys, and Rachel Taylor for their help with providing additional information.

Funding

These analyses have been funded by the British Trust for Ornithology’s Curlew Appeal.

Staff Author(s)


Related content