|
|
|
|
| |
The
Nest Record Scheme – some eggs-amples of the latest
productivity trends |
| |
|
In terms of nest recording, the 2007 breeding season
has been incredibly productive. We’ve had another tremendous
response from our army of volunteers collecting information for
the Nest Record Scheme (NRS – www.bto.org/goto/nrs.htm)
and the launch of the Nest Box Challenge in collaboration with the
BBC (which you can read about in the next edition of BTO News) has
meant that more people than ever are getting involved in monitoring
the breeding success of Britain’s birds. It may seem an incredibly
simple thing to do, but the value of the information provided by
briefly peering into a nest and counting the eggs or chicks inside
cannot be underestimated – data such as these hold the key
to understanding why bird numbers change from year to year.
|
| |
2006 proved to be a poor breeding year for
species like Tawny Owl, that feed primarily on small rodents.
|
|
Herbert
and Howells |
|
While this year has been positive in terms of monitoring
effort, feedback received from nest recorders and ringers suggests
that it has been less successful for many of the birds themselves,
with a general impression that many species, including Great and
Blue Tits, had a hard time coping with the incessant downpours during
early summer. Large inter-annual fluctuations in breeding success
are not the preserve of small passerines, however. In fact, we began
last year’s article about the NRS (BTO News 267) by offering
our commiserations to the UK’s owl population for what appeared
at the time to have been a fairly poor season. Now that the 2006
data have been added to the NRS dataset, which for some species
stretches back as far as 1939, it’s clear that productivity
was indeed below par for several owl and raptor species. Barn Owl,
Tawny Owl and Kestrel, all of which feed primarily on small rodents
and particularly Field Voles, produced significantly smaller broods
than had been predicted on the basis of long-term trends in productivity.
The fact that brood sizes of species such as Common Buzzard, Peregrine,
Merlin, Sparrowhawk and Little Owl, which are less reliant on rodent
prey, remained unaffected suggests that this drop in productivity
was caused by a reduction in vole abundance in 2006.
When looking at such changes in productivity over
time, however, it is important to put them into context. Vole populations
in the UK are well-studied and it is known that numbers fluctuate
regularly on a three-to-five year cycle, variation that is mirrored
by changes in the productivity of those bird species feeding on
them. Thus, a decline in breeding success in one year may be compensated
for by above average productivity the following season and it is
only when the average number of offspring produced per pair starts
to decline over a longer period of time that conservationists should
start to become concerned. Each year, NRS data are used to create
trends in productivity for over 90 species, spanning the past 40
years of submitted records, which are available to browse on-line
as part of the Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside Report (www.bto.org/birdtrends).
While the most recent trends for Barn Owl and Tawny Owl indicate
that productivity has not changed markedly during this period, those
produced for Kestrel suggest that brood sizes have declined significantly
over the last 15 years (Fig. 1.), leading to the addition of Kestrel
to the NRS Concern List.
|
Box
1: NRS Data Analysis
NRS data for 94 species were
analysed using the methods outlined in a recent review paper
in Bird Study 50: 254-270. Trends in laying date, clutch and
brood sizes, and in daily nest failure rates over the egg
and chick periods are described by linear of quadratic regression,
as appropriate. Trends were not calculated for those species
having a mean annual sample size of fewer than 10 records
and species with a mean annual sample size of between 10 and
30 records were given the caveat of “small sample size”.
Species are placed on the NRS Concern List
if a) they demonstrate significant declines in some aspect
of breeding performance over at least the last 15 years and
b) they have been placed on the Red or Amber Birds of Conservation
Concern list due to population declines or if there is some
uncertainty over their population status. |
The NRS Concern List contains those species that
are demonstrating simultaneous declines in abundance and at least
one aspect of productivity (see Box 1 for details). It is important
to exclude species that are increasing in number, as a fall in breeding
success may result from heightened competition between individuals
rather than from the action of environmental factors that may threaten
the conservation status of the species.
|
|
Species
|
|
Years
on list |
|
Significant
decline in: |
|
Breeding
Population trend |
| Kestrel |
|
2 |
|
Brood
size |
|
>25%
decline |
| Moorhen |
|
15 |
|
Clutch size
& Nest Survival (E) |
|
Fluctuating |
| Ringed
Plover |
|
11 |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
Uncertain |
| Lapwing |
|
New |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
>25%
decline |
| Nightjar |
|
New |
|
Brood
size* |
|
Uncertain |
| Tree
Pipit |
|
2 |
|
Nest
survival (C)* |
|
>50%
decline |
| Yellow
Wagtail |
|
8 |
|
Brood
size* |
|
>50%
decline |
| Grey
Wagtail |
|
5 |
|
Clutch
size & Brood Size |
|
Probably
decline |
| Pied Wagtail |
|
4 |
|
Clutch size
& Brood size |
|
Uncertain |
| Dunnock |
|
5 |
|
Nest
Survival (C) |
|
>25%
decline |
| Whinchat |
|
2 |
|
Nest survival
(E)* |
|
Probable decline |
| Willow
Warbler |
|
9 |
|
Nest
Survival (E) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Spotted
Flycatcher |
|
3 |
|
Clutch
size, Brood size & Nest survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Starling |
|
3 |
|
Brood
size |
|
>50%
decline |
| House
Sparrow |
|
4 |
|
Brood
size |
|
>50%
decline |
| Linnet |
|
16 |
|
Brrod
size and Nest survival (C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Bullfinch |
|
2 |
|
Nest
survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Yellowhammer |
|
5 |
|
Brood
size, Nest survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Reed
Bunting |
|
16 |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Corn
Bunting |
|
2 |
|
Brood
size* |
|
>50%
decline |
| |
* indicates that the average annual sample
size is small (between 10 and 30 records per year). (E)
indicates nest survival at the egg stage and (C) indicates
nest survival at the chick stage. Breeding population trends
are taken from www.bto.org/birdtrends. The inclusion of
each species on the Red and Amber Lists of Conservation
Concern is indicated by their colour (see http://www.bto.org/psob).
|
| |
| The
most recent list (Box 2) includes 20 species, two of which,
Lapwing and Nightjar, have been added this year due to an
increase in egg failure rates and a fall in brood sizes
respectively (Fig. 2. and 3.). |
| |
|
| |
| |
| Lapwing
populations have been in decline since the mid-1980s due
primarily to changing agricultural practices, with the loss
of the agricultural mosaic, drainage of wetland areas, increased
grazing pressure in upland areas and heightened levels of
nest predation all implicated in productivity declines.
Comparisons of the first and second BTO Breeding Bird Atlases
indicate that the range of Nightjar in the UK contracted
by more than 50% between the early 1970s and the early 1990s,
although the long-term population trend is uncertain. |
| |
 |
| |
Lapwing numbers have been on the wane for
over twenty years and an increase in nest failures at the
egg stage has occurred over the same period.
|
|
John
Harding |
|
| |
|
If you think that reading about the breeding success
of different bird species and how it changes over time
is fascinating, it really is nothing compared to witnessing
it first-hand. While the weather may seem cold and miserable
now, it’s amazing how quickly spring begins and
the birds start to breed, so when things start to warm
up again remember to keep your eyes open for signs of
nesting. Records of any species, even Robins and Blackbirds
in the garden, are incredibly useful as long as you can
see what’s in them, so if you find any please do
get in touch with us at nest.records@bto.org and become
part of the national army of nest recorders.
Thank you
None of this research would be possible without the fantastic
amount of time and energy that nest recorders invest in
collecting these data each year, so thank you very much
to everyone who has contributed to the NRS dataset. If
you haven’t yet, but would like to in the future,
contact us at nest.records@bto.org or look at our web
pages at www.bto.org/survey/nest_records/index.htm for
more information.
Thanks also to Mandy T Andrews for ensuring the NRS runs
smoothly, to Karen Wright for all her work on the NRS
database, to Mark Cubitt for the design and continued
development of the IPMR home-inputting program, which
has revolutionised record submission and to David Glue
for his contributions to the scheme. The Nest Record Scheme
is funded by the BTO/JNCC partnership.
Dave Leech, Carl Barimore & Humphrey Crick
|
Return to NRS Home Page
|