Bland et al. 2004

Bland, R., Tully, J. & Greenwood, J.J.D. 2004. Birds breeding in British gardens: an underestimated population? Bird Study 51: 97-106

Abstract

Capsule More birds breed in gardens than previous estimates suggest.

Aims To determine the numbers of birds nesting on or in houses and gardens in Great Britain.

Methods A questionnaire survey of 12,687 households in Great Britain was conducted in 2000, of which 6,035 responded. A follow-up survey, to which 1,757 responded, showed that people with no nests on their properties had been less likely to respond in the initial survey than had those with nests; it allowed the bias to be corrected. Sampling intensity differed regionally and by house-type (detached, semi-detached, terraced); national population estimates were corrected to allow for this. The analysis was restricted to the 17 species that nested most frequently in domestic properties and to four others.

Results It is likely that our estimates were somewhat too high for ten of the species, this has led in the past to significant under-estimation of the total British population.

Conclusions For some of the commonest British birds, accurate estimates of national populations are only possible if we get better estimates of numbers nesting in built-up areas than we have had in the past.

Back to Publications 2004 Page

Home > Research > Publications 2004 > Abstracts
Bland, R., Tully, J. & Greenwood, J.J.D. 2004. Birds breeding in British gardens: an underestimated population? Bird Study 51: 97-106 Abstract Capsule More birds breed in gardens than previous estimates suggest. Aims To determine the numbers of birds nesting on or in houses and gardens in Great Britain. Methods A questionnaire survey of 12,687 households in Great Britain was conducted in 2000, of which 6,035 responded. A follow-up survey, to which 1,757 responded, showed that people with no nests on their properties had been less likely to respond in the initial survey than had those with nests; it allowed the bias to be corrected. Sampling intensity differed regionally and by house-type (detached, semi-detached, terraced); national population estimates were corrected to allow for this. The analysis was restricted to the 17 species that nested most frequently in domestic properties and to four others. Results It is likely that our estimates were somewhat too high for ten of the species, this has led in the past to significant under-estimation of the total British population. Conclusions For some of the commonest British birds, accurate estimates of national populations are only possible if we get better estimates of numbers nesting in built-up areas than we have had in the past. Back to Publications 2004 Page