|
| Home
> Research > Information
for Conservationists > Habitat
changes in lowland landscapes > Section 3 |
|
Habitat changes in British lowland landscapes and their
implications for bird populations
by Rob Fuller |
 |
|
3. Agriculture |
 |
| Impacts
of agriculture on birds have been of two broad types. The first
is the loss of habitat, especially hedgerows and semi-natural habitats,
and the second concerns the intensification of systems of growing
crops and grass. |
| The destruction of semi-natural
habitat was particularly widespread in the immediate post-war decades.
Large areas of ancient woodland were destroyed and wet meadows have
more or less completely disappeared in many river valleys as a result
of drainage. More locally there were also losses of heathland, though
agricultural reclamation of heaths dates back at least to the Enclosure
Acts. Destruction of hedgerows in many regions took place on a very
large scale during the period 1950 to 1980, probably reaching its
peak in the 1960s. The effects of this habitat loss on bird populations
have not been adequately quantified but we do know that populations
of breeding waders have collapsed in many river valleys as the wet
meadows have disappeared. Hedgerow loss and woodland destruction
would have had very large effects on bird populations at a local
scale. In those parts of the country where hedge removal was most
severe, such as parts of East Anglia, there must have been large
reductions in the regional populations of specialist hedgerow birds
such as Lesser Whitethroat, Whitethroat, Yellowhammer and Linnet. |
| The
intensification of agriculture since the Second World War and its
effects on birds and other wildlife have been well documented (Stoate
1995, 1996, Aebischer et al. 2000, Vickery et al.
2001, Robinson & Sutherland 2002). It is now widely accepted
that changes in farming practices are the root cause of the large
declines that have occurred in populations of most specialist farmland
birds (see Baillie et al. 2002, information
on declines). In most cases, these declines started in the mid
1970s, which co-incided with the main period of intensification
(Chamberlain et al. 2000). A range of processes has been
involved. These are summarized in Boxes 1 and 2. The drive to increase
efficiency and yields has been so effective that the changes outlined
in the boxes have been ubiquitous. The net result has been a general
reduction in food resources and habitat quality for most farmland
birds at all seasons. Recent years have seen major efforts to restore
habitats and foods for birds through various agri-environment initiatives,
though farmland bird populations generally remain at a low ebb compared
with the situation 50 years ago. See
section 4.6 for information on farm woodlands.
|
|
 |
|
Box 1: Major changes in arable
farming since 1950 and their relevance to farmland bird populations
in lowland Britain (based on Fuller 2000)
Increasing mechanization
The use of machinery allows farming activities such as cultivation,
chemical application, harvesting and hedgerow management
to be undertaken extremely rapidly on a large scale. The
capacity for changing the face of the countryside is greater
than ever. Use of combines and more efficient harvesting
have resulted in less food for seed-eating birds. Ground-nesting
birds may be at greater risk of losing nests and chicks.
Fertilizer and
pesticide usage
Nitrogen inputs increased greatly on tilled land during
the 1970s and 1980s and there was increasing reliance on
inorganic compounds but less use of farmyard manure (FYM).
This has resulted in faster growing crops, which are less
suitable for ground-nesting birds such as Skylarks and Lapwings.
The increasing reliance on synthetic fertilizers has reduced
the
need for mixed farming with fertility-building leys and
livestock to produce FYM. Mixed farming offers a wider range
of food resources, feeding sites and nesting sites for farmland
birds than pure arable or grassland. Since the 1950s farming
has become dependent on a large number of herbicides, insecticides,
molluscicides and rodenticides. Many of these chemicals
act in some way to reduce potential foods of farmland birds
including seeds and invertebrates. Furthermore, the development
of herbicides that could control grass weeds was a major
factor enabling the switch from spring to autumn sowing
(see below). The use of pesticides to control disease has
also contributed to the demise of traditional rotations
and, hence, of mixed farming.
Reduction of spring
sowing
Since approximately 1970 there has been a decline in spring
sowing of cereals. The general move towards late summer
and autumn sowing has resulted in far less overwinter stubble
with an associated reduction in winter-feeding opportunities
for seed-eating birds, notably buntings, sparrows, finches
and Skylarks. Cereal crops now grow throughout much of the
winter period and consequently by the spring are often too
tall and dense for ground-nesting birds.
Simplification of rotations
and reduction in mixed farming
There has been a trend of specialization in farming with arable
dominating in the east of lowland Britain and grassland in
the west. Within arable systems, grass leys have become scarce
and rotations are much simplified with cereals often being
grown for several successive years. The implication for birds
is that the countryside has become more uniform in terms of
the foods and nest sites that it offers. Skylarks and Lapwings
are examples of breeding species that benefit from a diversity
of field types.

New crops and the introduction
of set-aside
Two major features of positive significance to birds are the
increasing prominence of oilseed rape in the countryside and
the large-scale introduction of set-aside during the 1990s.
Rape fields have proved attractive to several nesting birds
and to Linnets, which feed on the seeds. Rotational set-aside
has acted to some extent as a substitute for the loss of traditional
stubbles as it has provided food resources for many seed-eating
birds in winter as well as being used heavily by nesting Skylarks
and many feeding birds during the summer (Henderson &
Evans 2000). |
|
|
Box
2: Major changes in grassland farming since 1950 and their
relevance to farmland bird populations in lowland Britain
(based on Fuller 2000)
Increasing mechanization
This has made it possible to apply fertilizer on a large
scale and to readily implement under-drainage (see below).
However, an immediate impact has been the destruction
of nests and young of ground-nesting birds of which the
Corncrake has proved to be one of the most vulnerable.
Drainage and improvement
of rough grassland
This has been ongoing since the 1930s. A major consequence
has been widespread loss of habitat for breeding waders
notably Redshank, Snipe and Lapwing.
Fertilizer
usage
There were escalating inputs of inorganic fertilizer and
slurry on grass throughout the 1970s and 1980s. Grass
yields accordingly rose dramatically and floristic diversity
decreased. The general consequences have been reduction
of many invertebrate groups, fewer seeding broadleaved
plants and much denser vegetation. All these factors generally
acted to reduce the quality of grassland as both a nesting
and foraging habitat for many species, especially for
insectivorous birds in summer and for seed-eating birds
at all times of year. However, birds such as Starlings
and crows that depend on soil invertebrates, have not
been affected deleteriously as intensive grass management
may have actually increased the availability of food for
these species, especially in winter.
Reduction of hay
and increase in silage
Since the 1960s silage has become the dominant system
for mown grass. Silage making is highly mechanized, usually
with multiple cuts, and involves heavy fertilizer inputs
(see above for consequences).
Changing livestock
patterns
Between the mid 1970s and 1990s numbers of sheep increased
in most regions of Britain while numbers of dairy cattle
decreased over the same period. Intensive sheep grazing
produces relatively short, uniform swards that are poor
nesting habitats for most ground-nesting birds. For a
review of the implications for birds see Fuller and Gough
(1999).
|

|
|
|
|
© British Trust for Ornithology
BTO, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU
Tel: +44 (0)1842 750050 Fax: +44 (0)1842 750030 Email: info@bto.org
Registered Charity Number 216652. This page last updated:
31 October, 2007
|