Wider Countryside Report Header
BTO Blueline
Main WCR menu image Site navigation menu item Results overview menu item Other info menu item BTO website menu item
BTO Blueline
SPOTTED FLYCATCHER
Muscicapa striata
Spotted Flycatcher © G H Higgenbotham
 

• Population
  changes

• Productivity
  trends

• Additional
  information

Conservation listings
Europe: SPEC category 3, declining
UK: red (>50% population decline)
UK Biodiversity Action Plan: click here
Long-term trend
UK, England: rapid decline
UK population size
63,700 territories in 2000 (1988–91 Atlas estimate updated using CBC/BBS trend: BiE04, APEP06)
Status summary
Spotted Flycatchers have declined rapidly and consistently since the 1960s according to census data, and the decline is also reflected in the trend revealed by CES. Productivity measures indicate lower clutch and brood sizes and greater nest losses at the egg and chick stages, which raise NRS concern (Leech & Barimore 2008), and a decrease overall in the ratio of juveniles to adults. Demographic modelling shows that decreases in the annual survival rates of birds in their first year of life are most likely to have driven the decline (Freeman & Crick 2003). Decreasing survival rates may have been caused by deteriorations in woodland quality, particularly leading to declines in the large flying insects that are food to the flycatcher, or by conditions either on the wintering grounds or along migration routes (Fuller et al. 2005). Since trends have been similar across UK regions and habitats, however, it is more likely that the decline has been driven by factors operating outside the UK. Spotted Flycatchers are estimated to have declined by 59% across Europe during 1980–2005 (PECBMS 2007). A predator 'control' experiment has indicated that the abundance of nest predators may be determining the breeding success of Spotted Flycatchers, especially in woodland, where nest success was lower overall than in gardens (Stoate & Szczur 2006). Another study using nest cameras has identified avian predators, especially Jays, as responsible for most nest losses (Stevens et al. 2008).
 

Population changes

CBC/BBS UK graph
 
Table of population changes for Spotted Flycatcher

Source Period
(yrs)
Years Plots
(n)
Change
(%)
Lower
limit
Upper
limit
Alert Comment
CBC/BBS UK 39 1967-2006 121 -86 -90 -80 >50  
  25 1981-2006 142 -81 -86 -75 >50  
  10 1996-2006 222 -32 -38 -16 >25  
  5 2001-2006 196 -18 -27 -3    
CBC/BBS England 39 1967-2006 93 -87 -92 -82 >50  
  25 1981-2006 105 -82 -87 -75 >50  
  10 1996-2006 159 -32 -44 -16 >25  
  5 2001-2006 136 -23 -32 -10    
CES adults 22 1984-2006 15 -30 -75 32   Small sample
  10 1996-2006 13 13 -51 79   Small sample
  5 2001-2006 13 31 -24 94   Small sample
CES juveniles 22 1984-2006 11 -56 -86 -15 >50 Small sample
BBS UK 11 1995-2006 202 -37 -46 -23 >25  
  10 1996-2006 206 -35 -42 -21 >25  
  5 2001-2006 196 -20 -29 -2    
BBS England 11 1995-2006 144 -37 -48 -21 >25  
  10 1996-2006 146 -34 -44 -20 >25  
  5 2001-2006 136 -22 -32 -11    

BBS acknowledgement
 
CBC/BBS England graph
CES adult abundance graph
CES juvenile abundance graph
BBS UK graph
BBS England graph
 

Productivity trends

Table of productivity changes for Spotted Flycatcher

Variable Period
(yrs)
Years Mean
annual
sample
Trend Modelled
in first year
Modelled
in 2006
Change Comment
Clutch size 38 1968-2006 81 Curvilinear 4.22 eggs 4.15 eggs -1.7%  
Brood size 38 1968-2006 130 Curvilinear 3.61 chicks 3.6 chicks -0.3%  
Daily failure rate (eggs) 38 1968-2006 122 Curvilinear 1.77% nests/day 1.88% nests/day 6.2%  
Daily failure rate (chicks) 38 1968-2006 109 Linear increase 0.98% nests/day 1.43% nests/day 45.9%  
Laying date 38 1968-2006 72 None        
Juvenile to Adult ratio (CES) 22 1984-2006 21 Smoothed trend 133 Index value 100 Index value -25%  
Juvenile to Adult ratio (CES) 10 1996-2006 18 Smoothed trend 119 Index value 100 Index value -16% Small sample
Juvenile to Adult ratio (CES) 5 2001-2006 16 Smoothed trend 149 Index value 100 Index value -33% Small sample

 
Clutch size graph
Brood size graph
Egg nest failure graph
Chick nest failure graph
Laying date graph
CES productivity graph
 

Additional information

BTO blue divider
 

BTO Home | JNCC Home
 © British Trust for Ornithology. Charity No 216652 (England and Wales).Charity No SC039193 (Scotland)
Company Limited by Guarantee No 357284 (England and Wales).
Registered Office: The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.
Terms and Conditions
| Privacy Statement          Email:


This report should be cited as:
Baillie, S.R., Marchant, J.H., Leech, D.I., Joys, A.C., Noble, D.G.,
Barimore, C., Grantham, M.J., Risely, K. & Robinson, R.A. (2009).
Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status 2008.
BTO Research Report No. 516. BTO, Thetford. (http://www.bto.org/birdtrends)

Pages maintained by Iain Downie, Mandy T Andrews and Laura Smith: Last updated 18.02.2009