| BBWC
Home > Contents > Methodology
> Constant Effort Sites
2.6
Constant Effort Sites Scheme
The Constant Effort Sites (CES) Scheme uses changes in catch sizes
across a network of standardised mist-netting sites to monitor changes
in the abundance and breeding success of common passerines in scrub
and wetland habitats. At each constant effort site, licensed ringers
erect a series of mist nets in the same positions, for the same
amount of time, during 12 visits evenly spaced between May and August.
Year-to-year changes in the number of adults caught provide a measure
of changing population size, while the ratio of young birds to adults
in the total catch is used to monitor annual productivity (breeding
success). By monitoring the abundance of young birds between May
and August, the CES method should integrate contributions to annual
productivity from the entire nesting season, including second and
third broods for multi-brooded species, but will also include a
small component of mortality during the immediate post-fledging
period. Between-year recaptures of ringed birds can also be used
to calculate annual survival rates of adult birds, although this
requires specialised analytical techniques (e.g. Peach 1993) and
is not considered further here. Further details of the CES Scheme
are presented by Peach et al. (1996) and methods of analysis are
detailed in Peach et al. (1998) for abundance measures and Robinson
et al. (2007) for productivity measures.
The CES Scheme began in 1983 with 46 sites and now has around 120.
The distribution of CES sites tends to reflect the distribution
of ringers within Britain and Ireland. The majority are operated
in England, and there are small numbers in Scotland, Wales, Northern
Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. The CES routinely monitors
the populations of 25 species of passerines in scrub and wetland
habitats.
Data analysis
Smoothed trends in the abundance of adults and young are separately
assessed using a generalised additive model (GAM), with 85% confidence
intervals calculated by bootstrapping ( Fewster et al. 2000). At
sites where catching effort in a year falls below the required 12
visits, but eight or more visits have been completed, annual catch
sizes are corrected according to experience during years with complete
coverage, by incorporating an offset into the GAM (see Peach et al. (1998) for full details). Sites with fewer than eight visits in
a given year are omitted for the year in question.
Annual indices of productivity (young per adult) are estimated from
logistic regression models applied to the proportions of juvenile
birds in the catch, the year-effects then being transformed to measures
of productivity relative to an arbitrary value of 100 in the most
recent year. As above, catch sizes are corrected where small numbers
of visits have been missed. It should be noted that these indices
are relative, and are not estimates of the actual numbers of young
produced per adult (Robinson
et al. 2007).
Data are presented graphically with the smoothed trend in blue and
their 85% confidence limits in green. A caveat is provided for 'Small
samples' when the average number of plots per year is between 10
and 20.
Next
section – 2.7 Nest Record Scheme
Back
to Methodology Index
CLICK
HERE to go to the CES section of the main BTO website
|