Wider Countryside Report Header
BTO Blueline
Main WCR menu image Site navigation menu item Results overview menu item Other info menu item BTO website menu item
BTO Blueline
LAPWING
Vanellus vanellus

Lapwing © Mike Weston

 

• Population
  changes

• Productivity
  trends

• Additional
  information

Conservation listings
Europe: SPEC category 2, vulnerable
UK: amber (25–50% population decline, >20% European wintering population)
UK Biodiversity Action Plan: in preparation
Long-term trend
UK: moderate decline  
UK population size
156,000 (137,000–174,000) pairs in 1985–99 (O'Brien 2005: BiE04, APEP06)
Status summary

Although CBC recorded some increase in its early years, Lapwings have declined continuously on lowland farmland since the mid 1980s, probably because changes in agricultural practice have led to their breeding productivity dropping below a sustainable level (Hudson et al. 1994, Siriwardena et al. 2000a, Besbeas et al. 2002, Milsom 2005). National surveys in England and Wales showed a 49% population decline between 1987 and 1998 (Wilson et al. 2001). Population declines of more than 50% over 15 years in Northern Ireland (Henderson et al. 2002) mirror similar declines throughout grassland areas of Wales and southeast England (Wilson et al. 2001, 2005). BBS data indicate shallow increase in England since 1994, but steep decline in Scotland. Adult and first-year survival rates show no trend through time (Peach et al. 1994, Catchpole et al. 1999). Mean clutch size increased significantly as the population fell. Using NRS data for 1962–99, Chamberlain & Crick (2003) found that marginal upland had relatively low reproductive performance, and arable relatively high, while grazed grass had higher failure rates and lower clutch sizes than ungrazed grass: their results suggest that recent population change may have been influenced by changes in clutch failure rates, perhaps mediated by an increase in grazing intensity in marginal uplands and by increased predation rates, possibly associated with habitat change. There have been several very poor years for egg-stage survival since 1996, and the species is therefore now of NRS concern (Leech et al. 2007). A recent study has indicated that 88% of nest predations occurred during darkness, suggesting nocturnal mammals were to blame (Bolton et al. 2007).

The amber listing of this species is now based on UK decline, as well as the original criterion of international importance. Winter numbers counted by WeBS, mainly at coastal sites and omitting some big concentrations inland, have increased in Britain since the mid 1980s but decreased in Northern Ireland (Banks et al. 2006); these birds are mainly of continental origin.

 

Population changes

CBC/BBS UK graph
 
Table of population changes for Lapwing

Source Period
(yrs)
Years Plots
(n)
Change
(%)
Lower
limit
Upper
limit
Alert Comment
CBC/BBS UK 38 1967-2005 215 -33 -63 -3 >25  
  25 1980-2005 294 -53 -64 -37 >50  
  10 1995-2005 612 -11 -22 0    
  5 2000-2005 641 -4 -14 8    
CBC/BBS England 38 1967-2005 177 -9 -54 32    
  25 1980-2005 241 -43 -59 -27 >25  
  10 1995-2005 502 14 3 24    
  5 2000-2005 534 9 1 17    
WBS waterways 25 1980-2005 38 -9 -52 64    
  10 1995-2005 36 -16 -41 30    
  5 2000-2005 30 -9 -29 21    
BBS UK 10 1995-2005 592 -16 -25 -6    
  5 2000-2005 636 -4 -12 5    
BBS England 10 1995-2005 484 9 0 19    
  5 2000-2005 530 10 3 18    
BBS Scotland 10 1995-2005 85 -40 -54 -27 >25  
  5 2000-2005 81 -21 -37 -5    

BBS acknowledgement
 
CBC/BBS England graph
WBS UK graph
BBS UK graph
BBS England graph
BBS Scotland graph
 

Productivity trends

Table of productivity changes for Lapwing

Variable Period
(yrs)
Years Mean
annual
sample
Trend Modelled
in first year
Modelled
in 2005
Change Comment
Clutch size 37 1968-2005 122 Linear increase 3.69 eggs 3.82 eggs 3.6%  
Daily failure rate (eggs) 37 1968-2005 132 Curvilinear 1.64% nests/day 2.2% nests/day 34.1%  
Laying date 37 1968-2005 30 None        

 
Clutch size graph

 

 

Insufficient data on brood size
available for this species

Egg nest failure graph

 

 

Insufficient data on nestling failure
available for this species

Laying date graph

 

 

Insufficient data on CES
available for this species<

 

Additional information

BTO blue divider
BirdWeb logo, click to go to BirdWeb

BTO Home | JNCC Home
 © British Trust for Ornithology. Charity No 216652 (England and Wales).
Company Limited by Guarantee No 357284 (England and Wales).
Registered Office: The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.
Terms and Conditions
| Privacy Statement          Email:


This report should be cited as:
Baillie, S.R., Marchant, J.H., Crick, H.Q.P., Noble, D.G., Balmer, D.E., Barimore, C., Coombes, R.H.,
Downie, I.S., Freeman, S.N., Joys, A.C., Leech, D.I., Raven, M.J., Robinson, R.A. & Thewlis, R.M. (2007)
Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status 2007.
BTO Research Report No. 487. BTO, Thetford. (http://www.bto.org/birdtrends)

Pages maintained by Susan Waghorn and Iain Downie: Last updated 3 January, 2008