|
BBWC Home > Contents
> Discussion
> Changes in breeding performance
4.5 Changes in breeding
performance
Changes in a range of aspects of breeding performance can be measured
under the Nest Record Scheme and the Constant Effort Sites scheme. The
former provides information on components of breeding performance
per nesting attempt. The latter provides an index of breeding
performance accrued over all nesting attempts in a particular
year, combined with the effect of changes in the survival of fledglings
once they have left the nest but before they are caught as juveniles
– a period when losses of young can be high.
Breeding performance may be influenced by a variety of factors,
including food availability, predation pressure and weather conditions.
Variation in breeding performance may help to influence a population,
and may even be the main demographic factor responsible for determining
its size. Conversely, the breeding performance of a population may
be negatively related to its size, with productivity decreasing
as the number of individuals increases, and vice versa. This relationship
may be due to the action of density-dependent factors, such as competition
for resources: as numbers increase, competition for resources is
likely to increase, possibly resulting in a reduction in productivity.
Alternatively, increases in abundance may result from range expansion
into new, suboptimal habitats where breeding performance is poorer
and the average productivity of the population is thus lowered,
whilst declines may result from the loss of individuals from these
suboptimal habitats, leading to a subsequent increase in average
productivity.
4.5.1 Changes in clutch and brood size
Those species exhibiting statistically significant trends in clutch
and brood size over the past 35 years (1968–2003) are shown
in Tables 4.5.1.1 and 4.5.1.2. More species showed decreases than
increases in clutch size (17 decreases, 12 increases) while the
opposite was true for brood size (23 increases, 15 declines).
Table 4.5.1.1
Significant trends in clutch size measured between 1968 and 2003
See Help
for information on category meanings.
Nine species (Pied Wagtail, Long-tailed
Tit, Blue Tit, Great Tit,
Magpie, Raven, Chaffinch,
Greenfinch and Twite) exhibited
decreases in both clutch size and brood size over the period, whilst
another eight species (Barn Owl, Skylark,
Grey Wagtail, Dunnock, Redstart,
Starling, Tree Sparrow and Yellowhammer)
exhibited increases in both clutch size and brood size. For Moorhen
and Blackbird average brood sizes increased despite
a reduction in clutch size, suggesting that conditions for young
had improved for these species whilst conditions for parent birds
during egg formation may have deteriorated. Mistle Thrush
showed the opposite pattern with a reduction in average brood size
despite an increase in clutch size of similar magnitude.
Table 4.5.1.2 Significant trends in brood size measured between
1968 and 2003
See Help
for information on category meanings.
Long-term changes in clutch or brood size are associated with long-term
population trends in a number of species. Here we highlight those
changes that are both statistically significant and likely to be
of biological importance.
Declines in population size and brood size were recorded for Yellow
Wagtail and House Sparrow. Both species
show reductions of about half a chick per nesting attempt. The BTO
project on Yellow Wagtails, initiated in 2002,
aims to investigate the influence of decreased brood sizes on the
abundance of this species. In the case of the House Sparrow,
population modelling based on BTO data has shown that declines in
rural areas were caused by reduced survival rates but that these
declines were mainly halted due to improvements in breeding performance
(Crick et al. 2002).
The apparently accelerating reduction in brood size is therefore
of some concern. Work by Kate Vincent at the University of Leicester
has suggested that insect food for the chicks may be limited in
certain situations and recent brood size reductions may be a manifestation
of this at a wider scale. However, it should be noted that over
the long term some of the reduction in brood size may have been
compensated for by reduced nest failure rates at the egg and chick
stages. The reduction in average brood sizes of Mistle Thrushes
in recent years may be contributing to the failure of this species
to recover from its population decline and would merit further investigation.
Several increasing species show increasing brood sizes, particularly
Sparrowhawk, Collared Dove, Wren
and Nuthatch. The return of Sparrowhawks
into eastern areas of the UK, where populations of songbird prey
are greater, may be a factor in this increase. The UK Nuthatch
population, which has been expanding northwards and has increased
considerably in size, has exhibited an increase in average brood
size of more than one extra young per nesting attempt. It would
seem likely that this has helped to drive the population increase
of this species.
Inverse associations between clutch or brood size and population
trend are found in some 24 species. Such relationships may arise
through density-dependent processes where increased competition
leads to reduced clutch or brood sizes at higher population densities.
Totals of ten increasing species and 14 decreasing ones show such
associations. Notable examples amongst increasing species include
Mute Swan (clutch size), Great Tit
(clutch and brood size), Long-tailed Tit (clutch
and brood size) and Magpie (clutch and brood size).
Amongst declining species the examples include Barn Owl
(clutch and brood size), Skylark (clutch and brood
size), Tree Sparrow (clutch and brood size) and
Corn Bunting (brood size).
4.5.2
Changes in nest failure rates
Statistically
significant trends in the daily nest failure rates at the egg and
chick stages over the past 35 years (1968-2003) are shown in Tables
4.5.2.1 and 4.5.2.2. The number of species exhibiting declines in
failure rates at the chick stage (24) was more than treble the number
exhibiting increases (7), as was the number of species exhibiting
declines in failure rates at the egg stage (37 vs. 12). Thus the
general picture is one of improving nesting success.
Table 4.5.2.1
Significant trends in egg-stage daily failure rate of nests measure
between 1968 and 2003
See Help
for information on category meanings.
The changes in egg-stage and chick-stage failure rates were both
positive for Mute Swan, Nightjar
and Linnet. For a further 17 species (Merlin,
Stock Dove, Barn Owl, Tawny
Owl, Sand Martin, Robin,
Redstart, Stonechat, Song
Thrush, Reed Warbler, Magpie,
Jackdaw, Carrion Crow, Starling,
House Sparrow, Tree Sparrow and
Yellowhammer), egg-stage and chick-stage failure
rates both decreased. For a further two species (Whinchat
and Long-tailed Tit), declines in the failure rate
at one stage were partially cancelled out by increases in failure
rates at the other, suggesting that different factors may influence
productivity at egg and chick stages.
Table 4.5.2.2
Significant trends in chick-stage daily failure rate of nests measured
between 1968 and 2003
See Help
for information on category meanings.
Long-term changes in egg-stage or chick-stage nest failure rates
are associated with long-term population trends in a number of species.
Here we highlight those changes that are both statistically significant
and likely to be of biological importance.
Increased nest failure rates were associated with negative long-term
trends in population size for seven species, and may have contributed
to the observed population declines. These species were Nightjar
(both stages), Skylark (egg stage), Dunnock
(egg stage), Willow Warbler (egg stage), Spotted
Flycatcher (nestling stage), Linnet (both
stages) and Reed Bunting (egg stage). Although
Nightjar is included in this list of
declining species on account of its red-listed status, it should
be noted that recent surveys show a population increase. Reductions
in breeding performance at the egg stage have been implicated in
a detailed analyses of the population declines of the Linnet
(Siriwardena et
al. 2000b). It has also been suggested that poor breeding
performance may be preventing the recovery of Reed Bunting populations
(Peach et al. 1999).
However, the increasing trend in chick-stage failure rates of Spotted
Flycatchers has only just become significant and previous work suggested
that other demographic factors were more important in the decline
of this species (Freeman
& Crick 2003).
Thirteen species showed clear associations between long-term increases
in abundance and long-term reductions in nest failure rates. Sparrowhawk,
Buzzard, Pied Wagtail, Blue
Tit and Great Tit experienced reduced
nest failure rates at the egg stage, while Grey Heron,
Collared Dove and Great Spotted Woodpecker
showed reduced failure rates at the chick stage. The remaining five
species, Stock Dove, Robin, Magpie,
Jackdaw and Carrion Crow, showed
reduced failure rates at both the egg and chick stages. A reduction
in the egg-stage failure rates of Long-tailed Tits
may have contributed to their population increase, but this is partly
offby an increase in check-stage failure rates. Corvids, such as
Magpie, Carrion Crow and Jackdaw,
appear to have benefited from improvements in nesting success at
the egg stage, as have raptors such as Sparrowhawk
and Buzzard. Decreased persecution and reduction
in the use of pesticides are likely to have been important factors
in the recovery of these species. The improvements in the nesting
success of Stock Dove could have a major impact
on the size of the population, given the high number of breeding
attempts made by this species each year. Grey Heron
populations have increased over the last 70 years, and improvements
in chick-stage nest survival may have played a part in this increase,
perhaps aided by the declining impact of organochlorine pesticides
and improvements in water quality of riverine and standing water
bodies. Decreased chick-stage failure rates of Collared
Doves may have aided the rapid growth of the UK population
over the last 35 years, particularly as this species makes a relatively
large number of breeding attempts per year.
Inverse associations between changes in egg- or chick-stage nest
survival and population trend are found in some 18 species, while
only Long-tailed Tit (above) shows such a relationship
at one stage but a compensatory one at the other stage. Such relationships
may arise through density-dependent processes where increased competition
leads to increased failure rates at higher population densities.
Two increasing species showed long-term increases in nest failure
rates. Failure rates of Mute Swans increased at
both the egg and chick stages while failure rates of Oystercatchers
increased at the egg stage. Some 16 declining species showed evidence
of improving nesting success. Snipe, Redshank,
Woodlark, Tree Pipit, Wood
Warbler and Marsh Tit showed decreased
failure at the egg stage while Meadow Pipit, Bullfinch
and Corn Bunting, showed decreased chick-stage
failure rates. The remaining seven species, Merlin,
Barn Owl, Song Thrush, Starling,
House Sparrow, Tree Sparrow and
Yellowhammer show decreased failure rates at both
stages.
4.5.3 Changes in productivity from CES
The CES results start in 1984, so the changes in productivity shown
in Table 4.5.3 cover roughly half the time period of the Nest Record
Scheme results. The proportion of juveniles in the CES catch provides
a relative measure of annual variation in productivity that integrates
the effects of fledglings produced per attempt, number of nesting
attempts and immediate post-fledging survival. The CES is unique
in providing relative measures of adult abundance and productivity
from the same set of sites in wetland and scrub habitats. Overall,
nine species exhibit significant declines in the proportion of juveniles
while only Chaffinch shows an increase in this
measure.
Four species, Nightingale, Linnet,
Lesser Redpoll and Sedge Warbler,
all show greater than 50% declines in the proportion of juveniles
captured over the last 19 years, although it should be noted that
two of these occur on a relatively small number of plots. A further
five species show reductions in relative productivity of between
25% and 50%. Four of the nine species showing these large productivity
declines (Linnet, Lesser Redpoll,
Song Thrush and Willow Warbler)
have experienced significant population declines both on CES sites
and more widely (based on CBC/BBS figures). For Linnet
there is good evidence that variation in productivity has been important
in driving the decline (Siriwardena
et al. 2000b), but for Song Thrush
and Willow Warbler other work indicates that variation
in survival rates is likely to have been a more important contributor
to population changes (Peach
et al. 1999, Robinson
et al. 2004). The large decline in Nightingale
productivity may have contributed to the complex changes in its
distribution shown by the 1999
survey, which identified decreases in
abundance over large parts of the species' range. The four other
species (Sedge Warbler, Blue Tit,
Blackbird and Blackcap) with marked
reductions in productivity on CES sites have not experienced related
declines in abundance, either on CES sites or more widely. The causes
and consequences of the productivity declines observed in these
species are unclear and warrant further investigation.
Three species with long-term declines in abundance of greater than
50% on CES sites, Willow Tit, Spotted Flycatcher
and Lesser Whitethroat, all show stable or slightly
increased productivity over the last 19 years.
Taking the CES data set as a whole, 21 species show some decline
in productivity over the last 19 years while only six show increases.
The strong preponderance in trends towards lower productivity requires
urgent and more detailed investigation.
Table 4.5.3
Changes in productivity indices (percentage juveniles) for CES 1984-2003
(19 years) calculated from smoothed trend. Only those changes that
are statistically significant are shown.
See Help
for information on category meanings.
4.5.4 Changes in average laying dates
Over the past 25 years many species have exhibited a trend towards
progressively earlier clutch initiation (Crick
et al. 1997) with laying dates showing curvilinear
responses over the past 50 years as spring temperatures have cooled
and then warmed (Crick
& Sparks 1999). Table 4.5.4 confirms that over the past
34 years the majority of species exhibiting significant trends show
an advancement of laying dates rather than a delay. Thus 33 species
are laying between 29 days and 1 day earlier, on average, than they
were 35 years ago. Four species, Garden Warbler,
Turtle Dove, Stonechat and
Lesser Redpoll, are added to the list of earlier layers
published in the previous report in this series while Ringed
Plover and Blackbird are removed from
the list. There are no taxonomic or ecological associations between
the species showing such changes, and they seem to occur across
a wide range of species (Crick
et al. 1997). Only four species show significant
changes towards later laying, all of which suffer from small sample
sizes. It is likely that the laying dates of the majority of those
species that do not show a significant trend in timing of laying
are related to some aspect of weather, but that those aspects do
not show any trend over time (Crick
& Sparks 1999).
The significance of the changes in phenology for breeding performance
and productivity is currently unknown and needs to be investigated.
Earlier average laying may be beneficial for birds because earlier
fledging is often related to improved survival to the following
year. However, several studies are beginning to show that birds
are unable to advance their phenology sufficiently to match phenological
changes in their food supply, such that later nesting birds are
suffering from poorer productivity. Early nesting parents have an
increased chance of having their offspring recruited into the next
generation (Visser et
al. 1998). The conservation significance of factors
such as these needs to be assessed urgently.
Table 4.5.4 Significant trends in laying date (Day 1 = 1 Jan)
for 1968-2003
See Help for information
on category meanings.
Return to previous
page
Go to next page -
4.6 Conclusion
|