The British Trust for Ornithology

BBWC Home > Contents > Discussion > Changes in breeding performance

4.5       Changes in breeding performance

Changes in a range of aspects of breeding performance can be measured under the Nest Record Scheme and the Constant Effort Sites scheme.  The former provides information on components of breeding performance per nesting attempt. The latter provides an index of breeding performance accrued over all nesting attempts in a particular year, combined with the effect of changes in the survival of fledglings once they have left the nest but before they are caught as juveniles – a period when losses of young can be high.

Breeding performance may be influenced by a variety of factors, including food availability, predation pressure and weather conditions. Variation in breeding performance may help to influence, and may even be the main factor responsible for controlling the size of a population. Conversely, the breeding performance of a population may be negatively related to its size, with productivity decreasing as the number of individuals increases, and vice versa. This relationship may be due to the action of "density-dependent" factors, such as competition for resources: as numbers increase, competition for resources is likely to increase, possibly resulting in a reduction in productivity. Alternatively, increases in species abundance may result from range expansion into new, sub-optimal habitats where breeding performance is poorer and the average productivity of the population is thus lowered, whilst declines may result from the loss of individuals from these sub-optimal habitats, leading to a subsequent increase in average productivity.

4.5.1 Changes in clutch and brood size

Productivity data are currently available for 72 species. Those species exhibiting statistically significant trends in clutch and brood size over the past 31 years are shown in Tables 4.5.1.1 and 4.5.1.2. Although the numbers of species showing increases and decreases in clutch size were approximately equal (14 vs. 13 species respectively) there were many more species showing increases in brood size than decreases over the same period (25 vs. 7).

Table 4.5.1.1 Significant trends in clutch size

Species Period
(yrs)
Mean
annual
sample
Trend Predicted
in first year
Predicted
in last year
Change Comment
Long-tailed Tit 31 32 Linear decline 7.67 eggs 6.6 eggs -1.07 eggs  
Mute Swan 31 19 Linear decline 5.87 eggs 5.09 eggs -0.78 eggs Small sample
Magpie 31 52 Curvilinear 5.54 eggs 4.81 eggs -0.73 eggs  
Peregrine 31 16 Linear decline 3.7 eggs 3.1 eggs -0.6 eggs Small sample
Hen Harrier 31 13 Linear decline 5.05 eggs 4.45 eggs -0.6 eggs Small sample
Great Tit 31 94 Linear decline 8.22 eggs 7.7 eggs -0.52 eggs  
Raven 31 12 Linear decline 4.93 eggs 4.46 eggs -0.47 eggs Small sample
Moorhen 31 97 Linear decline 6.51 eggs 6.07 eggs -0.44 eggs  
Common Sandpiper 31 12 Linear decline 3.96 eggs 3.74 eggs -0.22 eggs Small sample
Crow 31 38 Linear decline 4.03 eggs 3.82 eggs -0.21 eggs  
Pied Wagtail 31 61 Linear decline 5.11 eggs 4.98 eggs -0.13 eggs  
Nightjar 27 16 Linear decline 1.99 eggs 1.91 eggs -0.08 eggs Small sample
Whitethroat 31 26 Curvilinear 4.59 eggs 4.54 eggs -0.05 eggs Small sample
Swallow 31 183 Linear increase 4.49 eggs 4.61 eggs 0.12 eggs  
Lapwing 31 130 Linear increase 3.69 eggs 3.82 eggs 0.13 eggs  
Yellowhammer 31 44 Linear increase 3.38 eggs 3.53 eggs 0.15 eggs  
Mistle Thrush 31 39 Linear increase 3.87 eggs 4.05 eggs 0.18 eggs  
Grey Wagtail 31 43 Curvilinear 4.68 eggs 4.86 eggs 0.18 eggs  
Dunnock 31 103 Linear increase 3.91 eggs 4.19 eggs 0.28 eggs  
Stonechat 31 23 Linear increase 5 eggs 5.29 eggs 0.29 eggs Small sample
Wren 31 101 Linear increase 5.58 eggs 5.88 eggs 0.3 eggs  
Whinchat 31 13 Linear increase 5.41 eggs 5.71 eggs 0.3 eggs Small sample
Starling 31 84 Linear increase 4.44 eggs 4.8 eggs 0.36 eggs  
Skylark 31 42 Linear increase 3.35 eggs 3.72 eggs 0.37 eggs  
Redstart 31 52 Curvilinear 5.86 eggs 6.27 eggs 0.41 eggs  
Tree Sparrow 31 93 Linear increase 4.78 eggs 5.35 eggs 0.57 eggs  
Barn Owl 31 13 Linear increase 4.5 eggs 5.07 eggs 0.57 eggs Small sample

See Help for information on category meanings.

Two species (Great Tit and Long-tailed Tit) exhibited decreases in both clutch size and brood size over 31 years, whilst another 10 species (Swallow, Yellowhammer, Dunnock, Stonechat, Skylark, Grey Wagtail, Redstart, Tree Sparrow, Starling and Wren) exhibited increases in both clutch size and brood size. For two species, declines in clutch size were partially (Magpie) or fully (Moorhen) compensated for by increases in average brood size, suggesting that conditions for young had improved for these species whilst conditions for parent birds during egg formation may have deteriorated.

Table 4.5.1.2 Significant trends in brood size

Species Period
(yrs)
Mean
annual
sample
Trend Predicted
in first year
Predicted
in last year
Change Comment
Blue Tit 31 136 Curvilinear 7.96 chicks 7.18 chicks -0.78 chicks  
Great Tit 31 162 Linear decline 7.39 chicks 6.7 chicks -0.69 chicks  
Long-tailed Tit 31 27 Curvilinear 6.83 chicks 6.3 chicks -0.53 chicks Small sample
Great Sp. Woodpecker 31 15 Curvilinear 3.12 chicks 2.6 chicks -0.52 chicks Small sample
Yellow Wagtail 31 13 Linear decline 4.86 chicks 4.38 chicks -0.48 chicks Small sample
Chiffchaff 31 30 Linear decline 5.12 chicks 4.81 chicks -0.31 chicks Small sample
Wheatear 31 67 Curvilinear 4.73 chicks 4.71 chicks -0.02 chicks  
Collared Dove 31 67 Linear increase 1.76 chicks 1.83 chicks 0.07 chicks  
Swallow 31 297 Linear increase 4.12 chicks 4.27 chicks 0.15 chicks  
Willow Warbler 31 141 Curvilinear 5.23 chicks 5.39 chicks 0.16 chicks  
Reed Bunting 31 66 Linear increase 4.04 chicks 4.21 chicks 0.17 chicks  
Yellowhammer 31 69 Curvilinear 2.96 chicks 3.15 chicks 0.19 chicks  
Spotted Flycatcher 31 136 Linear increase 3.65 chicks 3.85 chicks 0.2 chicks  
Linnet 31 126 Linear increase 4.12 chicks 4.34 chicks 0.22 chicks  
Stonechat 31 54 Linear increase 4.67 chicks 4.91 chicks 0.24 chicks  
Dunnock 31 108 Linear increase 3.42 chicks 3.67 chicks 0.25 chicks  
Little Owl 31 36 Linear increase 2.51 chicks 2.8 chicks 0.29 chicks  
Skylark 31 73 Linear increase 3.13 chicks 3.47 chicks 0.34 chicks  
Kestrel 31 113 Linear increase 3.81 chicks 4.17 chicks 0.36 chicks  
Grey Wagtail 31 88 Linear increase 4.09 chicks 4.48 chicks 0.39 chicks  
Tree Pipit 31 28 Linear increase 4.34 chicks 4.75 chicks 0.41 chicks Small sample
Rook 31 96 Linear increase 2.33 chicks 2.76 chicks 0.43 chicks  
Dipper 31 149 Linear increase 3.49 chicks 3.96 chicks 0.47 chicks  
Redstart 31 91 Curvilinear 5.08 chicks 5.59 chicks 0.51 chicks  
Magpie 31 87 Curvilinear 3.17 chicks 3.68 chicks 0.51 chicks  
Corn Bunting 31 12 Curvilinear 3.09 chicks 3.62 chicks 0.53 chicks Small sample
Sparrowhawk 31 83 Curvilinear 3.12 chicks 3.71 chicks 0.59 chicks  
Tree Sparrow 31 104 Linear increase 3.84 chicks 4.51 chicks 0.67 chicks  
Starling 31 218 Linear increase 3.17 chicks 3.86 chicks 0.69 chicks  
Moorhen 31 79 Curvilinear 3.43 chicks 4.38 chicks 0.95 chicks  
Wren 31 129 Curvilinear 3.79 chicks 4.88 chicks 1.09 chicks  
Nuthatch 31 56 Curvilinear 4.03 chicks 5.48 chicks 1.45 chicks  

See Help for information on category meanings.

Variation in clutch or brood size may influence population sizes of the following species:

  • Decreased clutch and population size: Whitethroat, although the change in clutch size is relatively small, as is the sample size.
  • Decreased brood and population size: Yellow Wagtail – the decline in average brood size of nearly half a chick per nesting attempt may be potentially important in determining the population size. The BTO project on Yellow Wagtails, initiated in 2002, aims to investigate the influence of decreased brood sizes on the abundance of this species.
  • Increased clutch and population size: Wren, although an increase in brood size would also be important.
  • Increased brood and population size: Two corvid species are prominent here; Rook and Magpie have both exhibited increased average brood sizes, as has Sparrowhawk. For the latter, the return of the species into areas of the eastern UK where populations of songbird prey are greater may be a factor in this increase. The UK Nuthatch population, which has been expanding northwards and has increased considerably in size, has exhibited an increase in average brood size of nearly 1.5 extra young per nesting attempt. It would seem likely that this has helped to drive the population increase of this species. Collared Doves have also experienced a slight increase in average brood size over the past 31 years. The population increase of this species is more likely to be due to range expansion, however.

Density dependent changes in average clutch or brood sizes are suggested for 15 and 16 species respectively, i.e. sizes have increased as populations decreased or vice versa. For a few species, long-term population data are not available and changes in clutch or brood size may be density dependent responses that are suggestive of population declines. This situation applies to Stonechat, Whinchat and Wheatear, species for which atlas data support the suggestion of population declines.

4.5.2 Changes in nest failure rates

Statistically significant trends in the daily nest failure rates at the egg and chick stage over the past 31 years are shown in Tables 4.5.2.1 and 4.5.2.2 (75 and 69 species, respectively, were analysed in total). The number of species exhibiting declines in failure rates at the chick stage was double the number exhibiting increases (20 vs. 10), while the number of species exhibiting declines in failure rates at the egg stage was more than three times the number exhibiting increases (35 vs. 10).  Thus the general picture is one of improving nesting success.

Table 4.5.2.1 Significant trends in egg-stage daily failure rate of nests

Species Period
(yrs)
Mean
annual
sample
Trend Predicted
in first year
Predicted
in last year
Change Comment
Tree Pipit 31 11 Linear decline 0.0457 nests/day 0.0096 nests/day -0.0361 nests/day Small sample
Jay 31 10 Linear decline 0.0544 nests/day 0.0225 nests/day -0.0319 nests/day Small sample
Woodlark 31 17 Linear decline 0.0397 nests/day 0.0153 nests/day -0.0244 nests/day Small sample
Long-tailed Tit 31 51 Curvilinear 0.0314 nests/day 0.0074 nests/day -0.024 nests/day  
Magpie 31 58 Linear decline 0.0281 nests/day 0.0043 nests/day -0.0238 nests/day  
Redshank 31 32 Linear decline 0.0419 nests/day 0.0185 nests/day -0.0234 nests/day  
Dipper 31 108 Curvilinear 0.026 nests/day 0.0034 nests/day -0.0226 nests/day  
Yellowhammer 31 66 Curvilinear 0.0519 nests/day 0.0353 nests/day -0.0166 nests/day  
Snipe 31 18 Linear decline 0.0328 nests/day 0.0173 nests/day -0.0155 nests/day Small sample
Treecreeper 31 25 Linear decline 0.0203 nests/day 0.0071 nests/day -0.0132 nests/day Small sample
Crow 31 56 Linear decline 0.0162 nests/day 0.0032 nests/day -0.013 nests/day  
Robin 31 184 Curvilinear 0.0248 nests/day 0.0124 nests/day -0.0124 nests/day  
Song Thrush 18 360 Linear decline 0.0421 nests/day 0.0317 nests/day -0.0104 nests/day  
Redstart 31 78 Linear decline 0.0119 nests/day 0.004 nests/day -0.0079 nests/day  
Tawny Owl 31 54 Linear decline 0.01 nests/day 0.0023 nests/day -0.0077 nests/day  
Starling 31 129 Linear decline 0.0115 nests/day 0.0038 nests/day -0.0077 nests/day  
Marsh Tit 31 20 Linear decline 0.0084 nests/day 0.0015 nests/day -0.0069 nests/day Small sample
Curlew 31 27 Curvilinear 0.0296 nests/day 0.0231 nests/day -0.0065 nests/day Small sample
Jackdaw 31 49 Linear decline 0.0082 nests/day 0.0022 nests/day -0.006 nests/day  
Sedge Warbler 31 48 Linear decline 0.0132 nests/day 0.0073 nests/day -0.0059 nests/day  
Pied Wagtail 31 84 Linear decline 0.0177 nests/day 0.012 nests/day -0.0057 nests/day  
Kestrel 31 41 Linear decline 0.0064 nests/day 0.0009 nests/day -0.0055 nests/day  
Barn Owl 31 12 Linear decline 0.0069 nests/day 0.0018 nests/day -0.0051 nests/day Small sample
Wren 31 149 Curvilinear 0.0171 nests/day 0.0125 nests/day -0.0046 nests/day  
Stock Dove 31 63 Curvilinear 0.0113 nests/day 0.0067 nests/day -0.0046 nests/day  
Wheatear 31 22 Curvilinear 0.0074 nests/day 0.003 nests/day -0.0044 nests/day Small sample
Merlin 31 29 Linear decline 0.007 nests/day 0.0028 nests/day -0.0042 nests/day Small sample
Buzzard 31 24 Linear decline 0.0062 nests/day 0.0021 nests/day -0.0041 nests/day Small sample
Reed Warbler 31 127 Curvilinear 0.015 nests/day 0.0115 nests/day -0.0035 nests/day  
Tree Sparrow 31 122 Curvilinear 0.0072 nests/day 0.0037 nests/day -0.0035 nests/day  
Sparrowhawk 31 40 Linear decline 0.0044 nests/day 0.0014 nests/day -0.003 nests/day  
Great Tit 31 155 Linear decline 0.0063 nests/day 0.0036 nests/day -0.0027 nests/day  
Blue Tit 31 137 Linear decline 0.0049 nests/day 0.0026 nests/day