|
BBWC
Home > Contents > Discussion
> Changes in breeding performance
4.5
Changes in breeding performance
Changes in a range of aspects
of breeding performance can be measured under the Nest Record Scheme and the Constant
Effort Sites scheme. The former provides information on components of breeding
performance per nesting attempt. The latter provides an index of breeding
performance accrued over all nesting attempts in a particular year, combined
with the effect of changes in the survival of fledglings once they have left the
nest but before they are caught as juveniles – a period when losses of young can
be high.
Breeding performance may
be influenced by a variety of factors, including food availability, predation
pressure and weather conditions. Variation in breeding performance may help to
influence, and may even be the main factor responsible for controlling the size
of a population. Conversely, the breeding performance of a population may be negatively
related to its size, with productivity decreasing as the number of individuals
increases, and vice versa. This relationship may be due to the action of "density-dependent"
factors, such as competition for resources: as numbers increase, competition for
resources is likely to increase, possibly resulting in a reduction in productivity.
Alternatively, increases in species abundance may result from range expansion
into new, sub-optimal habitats where breeding performance is poorer and the average
productivity of the population is thus lowered, whilst declines may result from
the loss of individuals from these sub-optimal habitats, leading to a subsequent
increase in average productivity.
4.5.1
Changes in clutch and brood size
Productivity data are currently
available for 72 species. Those species exhibiting statistically significant trends
in clutch and brood size over the past 31 years are shown in Tables 4.5.1.1 and
4.5.1.2. Although the numbers of species showing increases and decreases in clutch
size were approximately equal (14 vs. 13 species respectively) there were many
more species showing increases in brood size than decreases over the same period
(25 vs. 7).
Table 4.5.1.1 Significant
trends in clutch size
| Species |
Period
(yrs) |
Mean
annual
sample |
Trend |
Predicted
in first year |
Predicted
in last year |
Change |
Comment |
| Long-tailed
Tit |
31 |
32 |
Linear
decline |
7.67 eggs |
6.6 eggs |
-1.07 eggs |
|
| Mute
Swan |
31 |
19 |
Linear
decline |
5.87 eggs |
5.09 eggs |
-0.78 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Magpie
|
31 |
52 |
Curvilinear |
5.54 eggs |
4.81 eggs |
-0.73 eggs |
|
| Peregrine
|
31 |
16 |
Linear
decline |
3.7 eggs |
3.1 eggs |
-0.6 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Hen
Harrier |
31 |
13 |
Linear
decline |
5.05 eggs |
4.45 eggs |
-0.6 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Great
Tit |
31 |
94 |
Linear
decline |
8.22 eggs |
7.7 eggs |
-0.52 eggs |
|
| Raven
|
31 |
12 |
Linear
decline |
4.93 eggs |
4.46 eggs |
-0.47 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Moorhen
|
31 |
97 |
Linear
decline |
6.51 eggs |
6.07 eggs |
-0.44 eggs |
|
| Common
Sandpiper |
31 |
12 |
Linear
decline |
3.96 eggs |
3.74 eggs |
-0.22 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Crow
|
31 |
38 |
Linear
decline |
4.03 eggs |
3.82 eggs |
-0.21 eggs |
|
| Pied
Wagtail |
31 |
61 |
Linear
decline |
5.11 eggs |
4.98 eggs |
-0.13 eggs |
|
| Nightjar
|
27 |
16 |
Linear
decline |
1.99 eggs |
1.91 eggs |
-0.08 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Whitethroat
|
31 |
26 |
Curvilinear |
4.59 eggs |
4.54 eggs |
-0.05 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Swallow
|
31 |
183 |
Linear
increase |
4.49 eggs |
4.61 eggs |
0.12 eggs |
|
| Lapwing
|
31 |
130 |
Linear
increase |
3.69 eggs |
3.82 eggs |
0.13 eggs |
|
| Yellowhammer
|
31 |
44 |
Linear
increase |
3.38 eggs |
3.53 eggs |
0.15 eggs |
|
| Mistle
Thrush |
31 |
39 |
Linear
increase |
3.87 eggs |
4.05 eggs |
0.18 eggs |
|
| Grey
Wagtail |
31 |
43 |
Curvilinear |
4.68 eggs |
4.86 eggs |
0.18 eggs |
|
| Dunnock
|
31 |
103 |
Linear
increase |
3.91 eggs |
4.19 eggs |
0.28 eggs |
|
| Stonechat
|
31 |
23 |
Linear
increase |
5 eggs |
5.29 eggs |
0.29 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Wren
|
31 |
101 |
Linear
increase |
5.58 eggs |
5.88 eggs |
0.3 eggs |
|
| Whinchat
|
31 |
13 |
Linear
increase |
5.41 eggs |
5.71 eggs |
0.3 eggs |
Small
sample |
| Starling
|
31 |
84 |
Linear
increase |
4.44 eggs |
4.8 eggs |
0.36 eggs |
|
| Skylark
|
31 |
42 |
Linear
increase |
3.35 eggs |
3.72 eggs |
0.37 eggs |
|
| Redstart
|
31 |
52 |
Curvilinear |
5.86 eggs |
6.27 eggs |
0.41 eggs |
|
| Tree
Sparrow |
31 |
93 |
Linear
increase |
4.78 eggs |
5.35 eggs |
0.57 eggs |
|
| Barn
Owl |
31 |
13 |
Linear
increase |
4.5 eggs |
5.07 eggs |
0.57 eggs |
Small
sample |
See Help
for information on category meanings.
Two species (Great Tit
and Long-tailed Tit) exhibited decreases in both clutch size and brood
size over 31 years, whilst another 10 species (Swallow, Yellowhammer,
Dunnock, Stonechat, Skylark, Grey Wagtail, Redstart,
Tree Sparrow, Starling and Wren) exhibited increases in both
clutch size and brood size. For two species, declines in clutch size were partially
(Magpie) or fully (Moorhen) compensated for by increases in average
brood size, suggesting that conditions for young had improved for these species
whilst conditions for parent birds during egg formation may have deteriorated.
Table 4.5.1.2 Significant
trends in brood size
| Species |
Period
(yrs) |
Mean
annual
sample |
Trend |
Predicted
in first year |
Predicted
in last year |
Change |
Comment |
| Blue
Tit |
31 |
136 |
Curvilinear |
7.96 chicks |
7.18 chicks |
-0.78 chicks |
|
| Great
Tit |
31 |
162 |
Linear
decline |
7.39 chicks |
6.7 chicks |
-0.69 chicks |
|
| Long-tailed
Tit |
31 |
27 |
Curvilinear |
6.83 chicks |
6.3 chicks |
-0.53 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Great
Sp. Woodpecker |
31 |
15 |
Curvilinear |
3.12 chicks |
2.6 chicks |
-0.52 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Yellow
Wagtail |
31 |
13 |
Linear
decline |
4.86 chicks |
4.38 chicks |
-0.48 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Chiffchaff
|
31 |
30 |
Linear
decline |
5.12 chicks |
4.81 chicks |
-0.31 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Wheatear
|
31 |
67 |
Curvilinear |
4.73 chicks |
4.71 chicks |
-0.02 chicks |
|
| Collared
Dove |
31 |
67 |
Linear
increase |
1.76 chicks |
1.83 chicks |
0.07 chicks |
|
| Swallow
|
31 |
297 |
Linear
increase |
4.12 chicks |
4.27 chicks |
0.15 chicks |
|
| Willow
Warbler |
31 |
141 |
Curvilinear |
5.23 chicks |
5.39 chicks |
0.16 chicks |
|
| Reed
Bunting |
31 |
66 |
Linear
increase |
4.04 chicks |
4.21 chicks |
0.17 chicks |
|
| Yellowhammer
|
31 |
69 |
Curvilinear |
2.96 chicks |
3.15 chicks |
0.19 chicks |
|
| Spotted
Flycatcher |
31 |
136 |
Linear
increase |
3.65 chicks |
3.85 chicks |
0.2 chicks |
|
| Linnet
|
31 |
126 |
Linear
increase |
4.12 chicks |
4.34 chicks |
0.22 chicks |
|
| Stonechat
|
31 |
54 |
Linear
increase |
4.67 chicks |
4.91 chicks |
0.24 chicks |
|
| Dunnock
|
31 |
108 |
Linear
increase |
3.42 chicks |
3.67 chicks |
0.25 chicks |
|
| Little
Owl |
31 |
36 |
Linear
increase |
2.51 chicks |
2.8 chicks |
0.29 chicks |
|
| Skylark
|
31 |
73 |
Linear
increase |
3.13 chicks |
3.47 chicks |
0.34 chicks |
|
| Kestrel
|
31 |
113 |
Linear
increase |
3.81 chicks |
4.17 chicks |
0.36 chicks |
|
| Grey
Wagtail |
31 |
88 |
Linear
increase |
4.09 chicks |
4.48 chicks |
0.39 chicks |
|
| Tree
Pipit |
31 |
28 |
Linear
increase |
4.34 chicks |
4.75 chicks |
0.41 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Rook
|
31 |
96 |
Linear
increase |
2.33 chicks |
2.76 chicks |
0.43 chicks |
|
| Dipper
|
31 |
149 |
Linear
increase |
3.49 chicks |
3.96 chicks |
0.47 chicks |
|
| Redstart
|
31 |
91 |
Curvilinear |
5.08 chicks |
5.59 chicks |
0.51 chicks |
|
| Magpie
|
31 |
87 |
Curvilinear |
3.17 chicks |
3.68 chicks |
0.51 chicks |
|
| Corn
Bunting |
31 |
12 |
Curvilinear |
3.09 chicks |
3.62 chicks |
0.53 chicks |
Small
sample |
| Sparrowhawk
|
31 |
83 |
Curvilinear |
3.12 chicks |
3.71 chicks |
0.59 chicks |
|
| Tree
Sparrow |
31 |
104 |
Linear
increase |
3.84 chicks |
4.51 chicks |
0.67 chicks |
|
| Starling
|
31 |
218 |
Linear
increase |
3.17 chicks |
3.86 chicks |
0.69 chicks |
|
| Moorhen
|
31 |
79 |
Curvilinear |
3.43 chicks |
4.38 chicks |
0.95 chicks |
|
| Wren
|
31 |
129 |
Curvilinear |
3.79 chicks |
4.88 chicks |
1.09 chicks |
|
| Nuthatch
|
31 |
56 |
Curvilinear |
4.03 chicks |
5.48 chicks |
1.45 chicks |
|
See Help
for information on category meanings.
Variation in clutch or brood
size may influence population sizes of the following species:
- Decreased clutch and population
size: Whitethroat, although the change in clutch size is relatively small,
as is the sample size.
- Decreased brood and population
size: Yellow Wagtail – the decline in average brood size of nearly half
a chick per nesting attempt may be potentially important in determining the population
size. The BTO project on Yellow Wagtails, initiated in 2002, aims to investigate
the influence of decreased brood sizes on the abundance of this species.
- Increased clutch and population
size: Wren, although an increase in brood size would also be important.
- Increased brood and population
size: Two corvid species are prominent here; Rook and Magpie have
both exhibited increased average brood sizes, as has Sparrowhawk. For the
latter, the return of the species into areas of the eastern UK where populations
of songbird prey are greater may be a factor in this increase. The UK Nuthatch
population, which has been expanding northwards and has increased considerably
in size, has exhibited an increase in average brood size of nearly 1.5 extra young
per nesting attempt. It would seem likely that this has helped to drive the population
increase of this species. Collared Doves have also experienced a slight
increase in average brood size over the past 31 years. The population increase
of this species is more likely to be due to range expansion, however.
Density dependent changes
in average clutch or brood sizes are suggested for 15 and 16 species respectively,
i.e. sizes have increased as populations decreased or vice versa. For a
few species, long-term population data are not available and changes in clutch
or brood size may be density dependent responses that are suggestive of population
declines. This situation applies to Stonechat, Whinchat and Wheatear,
species for which atlas data support the suggestion of population declines.
4.5.2
Changes in nest failure rates
Statistically significant
trends in the daily nest failure rates at the egg and chick stage over the past
31 years are shown in Tables 4.5.2.1 and 4.5.2.2 (75 and 69 species, respectively,
were analysed in total). The number of species exhibiting declines in failure
rates at the chick stage was double the number exhibiting increases (20 vs. 10),
while the number of species exhibiting declines in failure rates at the egg stage
was more than three times the number exhibiting increases (35 vs. 10). Thus the
general picture is one of improving nesting success.
Table 4.5.2.1 Significant
trends in egg-stage daily failure rate of nests
| Species |
Period
(yrs) |
Mean
annual
sample |
Trend |
Predicted
in first year |
Predicted
in last year |
Change |
Comment |
| Tree
Pipit |
31 |
11 |
Linear
decline |
0.0457 nests/day |
0.0096 nests/day |
-0.0361 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Jay
|
31 |
10 |
Linear
decline |
0.0544 nests/day |
0.0225 nests/day |
-0.0319 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Woodlark
|
31 |
17 |
Linear
decline |
0.0397 nests/day |
0.0153 nests/day |
-0.0244 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Long-tailed
Tit |
31 |
51 |
Curvilinear |
0.0314 nests/day |
0.0074 nests/day |
-0.024 nests/day |
|
| Magpie
|
31 |
58 |
Linear
decline |
0.0281 nests/day |
0.0043 nests/day |
-0.0238 nests/day |
|
| Redshank
|
31 |
32 |
Linear
decline |
0.0419 nests/day |
0.0185 nests/day |
-0.0234 nests/day |
|
| Dipper
|
31 |
108 |
Curvilinear |
0.026 nests/day |
0.0034 nests/day |
-0.0226 nests/day |
|
| Yellowhammer
|
31 |
66 |
Curvilinear |
0.0519 nests/day |
0.0353 nests/day |
-0.0166 nests/day |
|
| Snipe
|
31 |
18 |
Linear
decline |
0.0328 nests/day |
0.0173 nests/day |
-0.0155 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Treecreeper
|
31 |
25 |
Linear
decline |
0.0203 nests/day |
0.0071 nests/day |
-0.0132 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Crow
|
31 |
56 |
Linear
decline |
0.0162 nests/day |
0.0032 nests/day |
-0.013 nests/day |
|
| Robin
|
31 |
184 |
Curvilinear |
0.0248 nests/day |
0.0124 nests/day |
-0.0124 nests/day |
|
| Song
Thrush |
18 |
360 |
Linear
decline |
0.0421 nests/day |
0.0317 nests/day |
-0.0104 nests/day |
|
| Redstart
|
31 |
78 |
Linear
decline |
0.0119 nests/day |
0.004 nests/day |
-0.0079 nests/day |
|
| Tawny
Owl |
31 |
54 |
Linear
decline |
0.01 nests/day |
0.0023 nests/day |
-0.0077 nests/day |
|
| Starling
|
31 |
129 |
Linear
decline |
0.0115 nests/day |
0.0038 nests/day |
-0.0077 nests/day |
|
| Marsh
Tit |
31 |
20 |
Linear
decline |
0.0084 nests/day |
0.0015 nests/day |
-0.0069 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Curlew
|
31 |
27 |
Curvilinear |
0.0296 nests/day |
0.0231 nests/day |
-0.0065 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Jackdaw
|
31 |
49 |
Linear
decline |
0.0082 nests/day |
0.0022 nests/day |
-0.006 nests/day |
|
| Sedge
Warbler |
31 |
48 |
Linear
decline |
0.0132 nests/day |
0.0073 nests/day |
-0.0059 nests/day |
|
| Pied
Wagtail |
31 |
84 |
Linear
decline |
0.0177 nests/day |
0.012 nests/day |
-0.0057 nests/day |
|
| Kestrel
|
31 |
41 |
Linear
decline |
0.0064 nests/day |
0.0009 nests/day |
-0.0055 nests/day |
|
| Barn
Owl |
31 |
12 |
Linear
decline |
0.0069 nests/day |
0.0018 nests/day |
-0.0051 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Wren
|
31 |
149 |
Curvilinear |
0.0171 nests/day |
0.0125 nests/day |
-0.0046 nests/day |
|
| Stock
Dove |
31 |
63 |
Curvilinear |
0.0113 nests/day |
0.0067 nests/day |
-0.0046 nests/day |
|
| Wheatear
|
31 |
22 |
Curvilinear |
0.0074 nests/day |
0.003 nests/day |
-0.0044 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Merlin
|
31 |
29 |
Linear
decline |
0.007 nests/day |
0.0028 nests/day |
-0.0042 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Buzzard
|
31 |
24 |
Linear
decline |
0.0062 nests/day |
0.0021 nests/day |
-0.0041 nests/day |
Small
sample |
| Reed
Warbler |
31 |
127 |
Curvilinear |
0.015 nests/day |
0.0115 nests/day |
-0.0035 nests/day |
|
| Tree
Sparrow |
31 |
122 |
Curvilinear |
0.0072 nests/day |
0.0037 nests/day |
-0.0035 nests/day |
|
| Sparrowhawk
|
31 |
40 |
Linear
decline |
0.0044 nests/day |
0.0014 nests/day |
-0.003 nests/day |
|
| Great
Tit |
31 |
155 |
Linear
decline |
0.0063 nests/day |
0.0036 nests/day |
-0.0027 nests/day |
|
| Blue
Tit |
31 |
137 |
Linear
decline |
0.0049 nests/day |
0.0026 nests/day |
| |