|
Mammal monitoring through the BBS
Mammal recording was introduced to the BBS in 1995 with a view
to help improve our knowledge of the distribution and population
trends of some of our commoner mammals. Compared with birds, the
population trends of mammals are relatively poorly known. Even though
mammal recording has always been a voluntary addition to the scheme,
more than 80% of BBS observers now actively look for them during
their bird-count visits.
Tracking Mammals Partnership
The data collected by BBS observers provide important information
for assessing population trends of certain mammal species. BTO is
a member of the Tracking Mammals Partnership (TMP), a collaborative
initiative involving 25 organisations, with varied interests in
mammals. TMP aims to provide good quality trend data to guide conservation
and wildlife management policy for mammals. There is also cooperation
to recruit, train and support the network of volunteers who carry
out the surveys.
TMP has published the first major report on UK mammal population
trends, assessing population change for 33 species and one subspecies,
representing over 50% of land mammals in the UK. The data are being
collected in a programme of 17 surveillance schemes, including the
BBS, which routinely provides trend data for nine species.
The
TMP report shows that overall, 40% of native mammal species are
increasing, 12% are declining, 16% have stable populations and for
32% the trends are unclear at present, with more years of data required
before population change can be reliably assessed. For non-native
species, 66% are increasing, 11% are declining and 22% have stable
populations. The Partnership plans to introduce new surveillance
schemes over the next few years for as many of the remaining land
mammal species as possible. The BBS is an important component of
the TMP surveillance programme and we would like to thank all the
volunteers who have contributed mammal data and hope they will continue
to do so in the future.
UK Mammals: Species Status and Population
Trends. First Report by the Tracking Mammals Partnership can be
downloaded from the TMP website (www.trackingmammals.org)
or can be purchased through NHBS, price £7.00.
Mammal recording on BBS squares in 2006
In 2006, mammal records were received for 83% of surveyed BBS squares
(2,740 squares). Table 1 shows the fifteen most frequently recorded
mammal species in 2006. For easily detectable diurnal species such
as Rabbit, Grey Squirrel, Brown Hare and some of the deer, the vast
majority of records were for individuals seen and counted during
the two counting visits. However, for other mammals, a large proportion
of the records were based on field signs, dead animals and local
knowledge of the species’ presence on that site. These include
nocturnal or crepuscular species such as Mole, Red Fox, Badger,
Hedgehog, Stoat and Weasel.
In addition to those listed in Table 1, a further 32 mammal species
were recorded during the survey, including (number of squares in
brackets): Mountain or Irish Hare (52), Red Squirrel (44), American
Mink (38), Otter (37), Common Shrew (29), Sika Deer (26), Wood Mouse
(18), Pipistrelle sp. (13), Field Vole (11), Water Vole (11), Bank
Vole (7), Chinese Water Deer (7), Common Seal (5), Feral Goat (5),
Pygmy Shrew (5), Grey Seal (4), House Mouse (4), Harvest Mouse (2),
Orkney Vole (2), Water Shrew (2), Wild Boar (2) and Barbastelle,
Brown Long-eared Bat, Dormouse, Ferret, Harbour Porpoise, Lesser
White-toothed Shrew, Natterer’s Bat, Noctule, Pine Marten,
Polecat and Serotine on single squares.
Single squares in Suffolk and Norfolk proved to be the most diverse
in 2006, with nine species of mammal being seen on each during the
two counts. One or more species was seen during the two bird count
visits on 2,396 squares (87.3% of squares surveyed for mammals).
In addition, field signs were noted, or mammals were seen on additional
visits on another 146 squares (5.3%), leaving 198 surveyed squares
(7.2%) where no mammals were recorded. It is very important that
we continue to receive completed mammal forms or online submissions
for those squares where no mammals were recorded, as these contribute
just as much as mammal-rich squares to the analyses of population
trends.
Table 1. Occurrence of common mammal species on BBS squares
in 2006
Mammal |
No. squares
present |
% |
No. squares
seen |
% |
No. individuals
counted |
| Rabbit |
1,873 |
68% |
1,702 |
62% |
15,617 |
| Grey Squirrel |
1,044 |
38% |
896 |
33% |
1,904 |
| Brown Hare |
917 |
33% |
848 |
31% |
3,019 |
| Red Fox |
816 |
30% |
338 |
12% |
427 |
| Mole |
742 |
27% |
4 |
0% |
7 |
| Roe Deer |
610 |
22% |
495 |
18% |
1,187 |
| Feral/Domestic Cat |
478 |
17% |
360 |
13% |
676 |
| Badger |
453 |
17% |
10 |
0% |
10 |
| Brown Rat |
212 |
8% |
39 |
1% |
54 |
| Reeves's Muntjac |
200 |
7% |
128 |
5% |
205 |
| Hedgehog |
194 |
7% |
13 |
0% |
15 |
| Stoat |
138 |
5% |
44 |
2% |
46 |
| Fallow Deer |
129 |
5% |
77 |
3% |
748 |
| Weasel |
100 |
4% |
19 |
1% |
20 |
| Red Deer |
97 |
4% |
69 |
3% |
620 |
NB: The first two columns of data show the number and percentage
of squares in which each mammal species was known to be present
(including squares in which the species was seen and a transect
count made). The next two columns show the number and percentage
of squares in which each mammal species was actually seen and counted,
and the final column the total number of individuals counted.
Monitoring UK mammal populations using
the BBS
By recording the number of each mammal species seen during the
BBS survey and the occurrence of species such as Red Fox and Moles
from obvious signs of their presence, the BBS has the potential
to monitor UK mammal populations. The occurrence of nine mammal
species on BBS squares over the period 1995-2005 was adequate to
allow annual indices of abundance to be calculated (Tables 2, 3
and 4). This included four species of deer (Red, Roe, Fallow and
Reeves’s Muntjac), three lagomorphs (Brown Hare, Mountain/Irish
Hare and Rabbit) and Grey Squirrel and Red Fox. These are all diurnal
(day active) or crepuscular (active at dawn and dusk) and are relatively
large in size, so their detectability is high. Data for the two
herding deer species (Red and Fallow) and for six species monitored
solely by indirect evidence of their presence (e.g. Stoat, Badger)
are continuing to be analysed in order to produce more reliable
trends.
Where data are sufficient, population trends have been calculated
for England, Scotland and Wales as well as for the UK overall. It
has also been possible to produce trends for seven of the nine English
Government Office Regions (North West, Yorkshire, East Midlands,
East of England, West Midlands, South East and South West) and for
four of the six Environmental zones (defined by landscape type)
within Great Britain. Population trends have been calculated only
for species recorded on a mean of thirty or more squares each year
and for this reason, we were unable to calculate any trends for
Northern Ireland, or the Government Office Regions of North East
England and London. For those species too seldom detected for any
indices to be calculated, the BBS can still provide information
on their distribution and changes in abundance.
Table 2. Changes in abundance of Rabbit, Brown Hare and
Mountain/Irish Hare between 1995 and 2005.
| Country/Region |
Rabbit |
Brown
Hare |
Mountain
Hare |
| |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
United Kingdom |
1077 |
-15 |
525 |
-9 |
39 |
-8 |
England |
866 |
-3 |
452 |
-5 |
|
|
Scotland |
99 |
-66 |
52 |
-26 |
|
|
Wales |
74 |
-16 |
|
|
|
|
| English Government Office Regions |
| North West |
90 |
-33 |
52 |
-37 |
|
 |
| Yorkshire |
77 |
4 |
45 |
61 |
|
 |
| East Midlands |
73 |
-59 |
61 |
2 |
|
 |
| East of England |
157 |
73 |
120 |
13 |
|
 |
| West Midlands |
90 |
-15 |
|
|
|
 |
| South East |
212 |
-17 |
74 |
-32 |
|
 |
| South West |
133 |
54 |
50 |
1 |
|
 |
| Environmental Zones |
| 1. Easterly Lowlands (Eng/Wal) |
474 |
-9 |
283 |
-3 |
|
 |
| 2. Westerly Lowlands (Eng/Wal) |
364 |
9 |
138 |
-1 |
|
 |
| 3. Uplands (Eng/Wal) |
104 |
-13 |
50 |
-39 |
|
 |
| 4. Scottish Lowlands |
59 |
-75 |
|
|
|
 |
Table conventions: the figures presented in the
’n’ columns show the mean number of squares the species
was recorded in each year during 1995-2005 (excluding squares which
were surveyed in only one year). The figures presented in the ‘%
Chg’ columns show the percentage changes in population levels
during 1995-2005, in bold where the change was significant at 95%.
Cells left blank indicate that the sample size was too small in
that country/region for a trend to be calculated.
Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus. Numbers
peaked in the UK in 1997 but have declined almost continuously since,
albeit with a slight recovery in 2005. Overall, numbers are still
significantly fewer in 2005 than compared to 1995. There has also
been a significant decline in Scotland over the survey period, and
within several of the English regions. The Rabbit is a widespread
species across the UK.
Brown Hare Lepus europaeus. There was
no significant change in numbers in the UK between 1995 and 2005.
Abundance has not significantly changed in Scotland or England,
although there have been significant decreases in North West and
South East England and significant increases in Yorkshire. Brown
Hares have also declined significantly in the uplands of England
and Wales. The Brown Hare is a widespread species across the UK,
although scarce in Northern Ireland.
Mountain or Irish Hare Lepus timidus.
No significant change in numbers was detected in the UK between
1995 and 2005. Mountain/Irish Hares are primarily found in Scotland
and Northern Ireland, although there is a small population in the
Peak District area of Derbyshire and South Yorkshire. The Irish
sub-species of Mountain Hare (the Irish Hare) was recorded on too
few squares for a separate trend to be calculated.
Table 3. Changes in abundance of Grey
Squirrel, Red Fox and Red Deer between 1995 and 2005. Conventions
as in Table 2.
| Country/Region |
Grey
Squirrel |
Red Fox |
Red Deer |
| n |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
| United Kingdom |
478 |
42 |
218 |
-33 |
48 |
20 |
| England |
426 |
40 |
175 |
-30 |
|
|
| Scotland |
|
|
|
|
37 |
-33 |
| Wales |
39 |
56 |
|
|
|
|
| English Government Office Regions
|
| East of England |
70 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
| West Midlands |
56 |
-9 |
|
|
|
|
| South East |
128 |
29 |
49 |
47 |
|
|
| South West |
62 |
49 |
38 |
-55 |
|
|
| Environmental Zones
|
| 1. Easterly Lowlands (Engl/Wal) |
236 |
26 |
94 |
-25 |
|
|
| 2. Westerly Lowlands (Eng/Wal) |
196 |
55 |
79 |
-40 |
|
|
Grey Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis.
Overall in the UK, numbers increased significantly between 1995
and 2005. Numbers increased significantly in Wales and in England
overall, and within the English regions of the East of England,
South East and South West. The Grey Squirrel is a widespread species
in England and Wales, but is more localised in Scotland (mainly
central lowlands) and Northern Ireland.
Red Fox Vulpes vulpes. There was a significant
decline in numbers in the UK between 1995 and 2005. Apart of the
South East of England where a significant increased was recorded,
numbers declined in all of the countries and regions where this
species was recorded on enough squares for trends to be calculated.
The Red Fox is a widespread species across the UK
Red Deer Cervus elaphus. No significant
change in numbers was detected in the UK between 1995 and 2005.
Following recommendations in Newson et al. 2006, to reduce
the influence that a small number of sites recording large herds
can have on the trends of this species, an alternative model distribution
was fitted to these data. A small number of counts from deer parks
were also excluded from the dataset. The Red Deer is a widespread
species across much of the UK, although the majority of BBS records
were located in Scotland where the bulk of the population resides.
Table 4. Changes in abundance of Fallow Deer, Roe Deer
and Reeves’s Muntjac between 1995 and 2005. Conventions as
in Table 2.
| Country/Region |
Fallow Deer |
Roe Deer |
Muntjac |
| n |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
n |
% Chg |
| United Kingdom |
36 |
-41 |
237 |
25 |
45 |
-9 |
| England |
35 |
-44 |
176 |
30 |
45 |
-9 |
| Scotland |
|
|
61 |
-7 |
|
|
| English Government Office Regions
|
| South East |
|
|
64 |
45 |
|
|
| South West |
|
|
60 |
51 |
|
|
| Environmental Zones
|
| 1. Easterly Lowlands (Engl/Wal) |
|
|
99 |
58 |
40 |
-20 |
| 2. Westerly Lowlands (Eng/Wal) |
|
|
6 |
-1 |
|
|
Fallow Deer Dama dama. No significant
change in numbers was detected in the UK between 1995 and 2005.
Following recommendations in Newson et al. 2006, to reduce the influence
that a small number of sites recording large herds can have on the
trends of this species, an alternative model distribution was fitted
to these data. A small number of counts from deer parks were also
excluded from the dataset. The majority of BBS squares reporting
Fallow Deer are in England, although this species is recorded sparingly
across the UK.
Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus. Roe Deer
numbers increased significantly in the UK between 1995 and 2005,
although there has been a gradual decline in numbers since a peak
was reached in 2002. Numbers have also increased significantly in
England over the survey period, and within the South East and South
West regions, and the Easterly lowlands of England and Wales. The
Roe Deer is a widespread species throughout much of Scotland and
England, although it is curiously scarce in central England. This
species is absent from Northern Ireland and rare in Wales.
Reeves’s Muntjac Muntiacus reevesi.
Numbers increased continuously in the UK between 1995 and 2002.
This was then followed by a gradual decline, although there has
been no significant change over the entire survey period (1995-2005).
Muntjac Deer are primarily found in south and central England and
Wales. However, north of the Humber, occurrence is patchy, but it
does reach close to the Scottish border.
Further reading
Newson, S.E. & Noble, D.G. (2005) The
production of population trends for UK mammals using BBS mammal
data, 1995-2002. BTO Research Report No. 360. BTO, Thetford.
Newson, S.E. & Noble, D.G. (2005) The
production of population trends for UK mammals using BBS mammal
data: 1995-2003 update. BTO Research Report No. 404. BTO, Thetford.
Download
report (.pdf 848Kb*)
Newson, S.E. & Noble, D.G. (2006) The
production of population trends for UK mammals using BBS mammal
data: 1995-2004 update. BTO Research Report No. 428. BTO, Thetford.
Download
report (.pdf 1.71Mb*)
* Needs Adobe Acrobat Reader - download a copy here

|